Literature DB >> 10147050

Optimising the economic efficiency of drug studies.

M E Kitler1.   

Abstract

The cost of the development of a new drug product, from concept and synthesis of a new chemical entity to safety and efficacy testing, to the approval process and postmarketing surveillance, has more than quadrupled in the last 20 years. To amortise these costs, the pharmaceutical industry has taken on international dimensions. These efforts will not be enough. This review outlines many cost-saving and cost-containment suggestions that have been instituted or that need to be instituted in order to bring cost-effective drug therapy to individual patients. As the cost of illness continues to increase worldwide, it is imperative that new and cost-effective medications be developed and brought to worldwide markets. This article considers components of the drug discovery and development processes which are likely to be inefficient and correctable. It further reviews current knowledge about the conduct of different parts of the processes, including different types of clinical trials and proposals that have been made to address these in an efficient manner. Documented and proposed cost-containment measures are presented, using several large scale trials as examples. Particular emphasis is placed on statistical methods and their contribution to either efficiencies or inefficiencies. No facet of the drug/product development should be overlooked in the attempt to reduce costs, from reducing the time it takes to bring a product to market to simple but too-frequently occurring errors, such as failing to have trial material at hand at the optimum time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10147050     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199202050-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  83 in total

1.  An economic evaluation of asthma in the United States.

Authors:  K B Weiss; P J Gergen; T A Hodgson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension treatment--a review of methodological issues.

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Measuring the adverse effects of unnecessary hypertension drug therapy: QALYs vs HYE.

Authors:  A Gafni
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 0.825

Review 4.  To increase power in randomized clinical trials without increasing sample size.

Authors:  H C Kraemer
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1991

5.  High risk subjects and the cost of large field trials.

Authors:  E J Sondik; B W Brown; A Silvers
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1974-07

Review 6.  Randomized vs. historical clinical trials. Are the benefits worth the cost?

Authors:  W D Dupont
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  The impact of DRGs on clinical research centers. A multi-institutional study.

Authors:  B Langland-Orban; J K Cuddeback; J E Ives; M J Barton
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Who's paying for new drugs?

Authors:  R K Oldham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Stimulants and antidepressant pharmacokinetics in hyperactive children.

Authors:  J Elia
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1991

10.  Methodologic issues in maintenance therapy clinical trials.

Authors:  J B Greenhouse; D Stangl; D J Kupfer; R F Prien
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1991-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.