Literature DB >> 10147028

Selection of items and avoidance of bias in quality of life scales.

M E Hyland1.   

Abstract

The total score of a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire reflects the items that make up the questionnaire. Although different questionnaires have strikingly similar items, the balance between types of items can affect research outcomes. Four general quality of life (QOL) scales and one specific scale may be compared to show how the balance of items can bias the results to: (a) increase or decrease the chance of obtaining a significant result in a clinical trial; (b) make one treatment appear better or worse compared with that of a competitor; (c) make the QOL of one disease category appear better or worse than that of another disease category. Healthcare decision-making should be based on relatively unaggregated measures of health.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10147028     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199201030-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  6 in total

1.  Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy.

Authors:  D A Freund; R S Dittus
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Standardisation of quality of life trials: an industry perspective.

Authors:  B Spilker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A scale for assessing quality of life in adult asthma sufferers.

Authors:  M E Hyland; S Finnis; S H Irvine
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Quality of life instruments in the evaluation of new drugs.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D Cook
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; W B Carter; B S Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  Quality-of-life evaluation in diabetes.

Authors:  C Eiser; J E Tooke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A reformulation of quality of life for medical science.

Authors:  M E Hyland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life in burn patients in Greece.

Authors:  N Stampolidis; O Castana; N Nikiteas; K Vlasis; S A Koupidis; I A Grammatikopoulos; E Mantzari; A Pallantzas; P Kourakos; O Papadopoulos
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2012-12-31

4.  Quality-of-life assessment in respiratory disease: an examination of the content and validity of four questionnaires.

Authors:  M E Hyland
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Epoetin: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic renal failure and its effects on quality of life.

Authors:  R Whittington; L B Barradell; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Sensitivity of quality of life domains and constructs to longitudinal change in a clinical trial comparing salmeterol with placebo in asthmatics.

Authors:  M E Hyland; C A Kenyon; P A Jacobs
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck.

Authors:  C D Fankhauser; U Mutter; E Aghayev; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Domains, constructs and the development of the breathing problems questionnaire.

Authors:  M E Hyland; J Bott; S Singh; C A Kenyon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  A qualitative study of the impact of severe asthma and its treatment showing that treatment burden is neglected in existing asthma assessment scales.

Authors:  Michael E Hyland; Ben Whalley; Rupert C Jones; Matthew Masoli
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  A brief guide to the selection of quality of life instrument.

Authors:  Michael E Hyland
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.