Literature DB >> 10146961

Cost-effectiveness study of a lipid-lowering therapy in hyperlipoproteinaemia type IIb and type IV (Frederickson).

R Bergemann1, A Brandt, W Siegrist.   

Abstract

We performed a cost-effectiveness simulation of acipimox, bezafibrate, fenofibrate and gemfibrozil in patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia type IIb and IV (Frederickson). A distinction was made between patients with HLP type IIb and IV and HLP associated with diabetes mellitus type II (NIDDM). Direct costs were assessed as those incurred by social security for the treatment, and indirect costs were not taken into account. In appropriate dosages, all 4 substances can be considered equally efficacious in lowering lipid levels, although gallstones occur 3 times more frequently in patients treated with fibrates than in those treated with acipimox. Acquisition costs of the 4 drugs under consideration are comparable. Thus, when hospitalisation costs for treatment of gallstones are taken into account, therapy with acipimox is more cost effective than fibrate therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10146961     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199303020-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  27 in total

1.  Gallstone lithotripsy vs cholecystectomy. A preliminary cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  J G Rothschild; R F Holbrook; R B Reinhold
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-06

2.  Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and mortality: implications from a cohort of 361,662 men.

Authors:  M J Martin; S B Hulley; W S Browner; L H Kuller; D Wentworth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Fibric acids: effects on lipids and lipoprotein metabolism.

Authors:  S M Grundy; G L Vega
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-11-27       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Biliary lipid secretion in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia. Influence of bezafibrate and fenofibrate.

Authors:  O Leiss; K Meyer-Krahmer; K von Bergmann
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.922

5.  [Expected costs in the conservative and surgical treatment of uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis].

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; U Leuschner; M Leuschner
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Lipid alterations and decline in the incidence of coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study.

Authors:  V Manninen; M O Elo; M H Frick; K Haapa; O P Heinonen; P Heinsalmi; P Helo; J K Huttunen; P Kaitaniemi; P Koskinen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Dyslipoproteinemias and manifestations of coronary heart disease. The Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study.

Authors:  C Rubenstein; D Romhilt; P Segal; G Heiss; L E Chambless; K E Boyle; L G Ekelund; R Adolph; L T Sheffield
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  [Lipid-lowering effect of bezafibrate in patients with diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidaemia (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Wahl; C Hasslacher; P D Lang; J Vollmar
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1978-08-04       Impact factor: 0.628

9.  The Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) study: prevalence of hyperlipidemia in persons with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus and the relationship to coronary heart disease.

Authors:  G Assmann; H Schulte
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Effects of fenofibrate on bile lipid composition.

Authors:  R H Palmer
Journal:  Arteriosclerosis       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bezafibrate. An update of its pharmacology and use in the management of dyslipidaemia.

Authors:  K L Goa; L B Barradell; G L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Cost effectiveness of treating low HDL-cholesterol in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Joel W Hay; Kimberly L Sterling
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.