Literature DB >> 10146924

Drug expenditure and new drug introductions: the Swedish experience.

U G Gerdtham1, M Johannesson, B Jönsson.   

Abstract

This article measures the impact of the switch to new and more expensive drugs on the aggregate drug expenditure (both prescription and nonprescription) in Sweden during the period 1974 to 1991, and also on the disaggregated expenditure for 3 medical areas: asthma, hypertension and peptic ulcer disease. During the period studied, nominal drug expenditure increased 6-fold. The retail price index of drugs and the number of prescribed drugs accounted for 51.6 and 5.8% of this increase, respectively. The remaining residual amount accounted for 42.6%. Since the price index of drugs increased more slowly than the overall net price index of goods and services, the relative price of drugs decreased dramatically by about 30%. This means that increases in prices of drugs cannot explain the increase in real inflation-adjusted drug expenditure. We also show that the residual increase can be partly explained by the introduction of new and more expensive drugs. It is therefore argued that economic evaluations which compare the extra costs induced by new drugs with the extra benefits should be undertaken to guide decisions about the prescription of new and more expensive drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10146924     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199304030-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  10 in total

1.  Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy.

Authors:  D A Freund; R S Dittus
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Economic evaluation of drug therapy: a review of the contingent valuation method.

Authors:  M Johannesson; P O Johansson; B Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost-benefit analysis?

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment: metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics.

Authors:  M Johannesson; J Wikstrand; B Jönsson; G Berglund; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Advantages of high-dose inhaled budesonide.

Authors:  E Adelroth; S Thompson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A guide to benefit-cost analysis, as seen through a controlled experiment in treating the mentally ill.

Authors:  B A Weisbrod
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.265

7.  [High-dosage inhalation steroids in asthma--analysis of costs and use in health care].

Authors:  E Adelroth; S Thompson
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  1984-11-14

8.  Metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics in hypertension. Morbidity results from the MAPHY Study.

Authors:  J Wikstrand; I Warnold; J Tuomilehto; G Olsson; H J Barber; K Eliasson; D Elmfeldt; B Jastrup; N B Karatzas; J Leer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  The effects of cimetidine on the cost of ulcer disease in Sweden.

Authors:  B Jönsson; P Carlsson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The costs of treating hypertension in Sweden. An empirical investigation in primary health care.

Authors:  M Johannesson; L Borgquist; B Jönsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.581

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Why did drug spending increase during the 1990s? A decomposition based on Swedish data.

Authors:  Ulf-G Gerdtham; Douglas Lundin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.