Literature DB >> 10146865

Net economic benefit of a manufactured dinoprostone gel for pre-induction cervical ripening.

S L Hass1, M J Lucas.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the net economic cost or benefit of pretreating women who have a medical indication for induction of labour, and an unprepared (unripe) cervix, with a manufactured dinoprostone (prostaglandin E 2) gel. Findings of a meta-analysis of the results of 3 large, randomised clinical trials were employed in the construction of a decision tree used in the economic analysis. For the intended target population, the primary clinical and economic outcomes of gel pretreatment were shortening of the treatment-to-delivery interval, an increase in the percentage of patients achieving labour and a decrease in the percentage of patients requiring delivery by caesarean section. Application of cost factors associated with these and other variables led to a finding of net savings associated with use of the dinoprostone gel pretreatment, compared with no gel pretreatment, of $US159 to $US214 (1993 prices) per treated patient, corresponding to the maximum and minimum duration of the pre-induction treatment period, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10146865     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199405010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cervical ripening.

Authors:  K F Trofatter
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Preinduction cervical softening with endocervical PGE2 gel. A multi-center trial.

Authors:  M L Noah; J M DeCoster; T J Fraser; J D Orr
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Variations of biologic activity of low-dose prostaglandin E2 on cervical ripening.

Authors:  R P Lorenz; J J Botti; R A Chez; N Bennett
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Extemporaneous preparation of a dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening.

Authors:  L J Gauger
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1983-12

5.  Relation of prelabor evaluation to inducibility and the course of labor.

Authors:  E A Friedman; K R Niswander; N P Bayonet-Rivera; M R Sachtleben
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and labour induction: a multicentre placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  P Bernstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety of vaginal recombinant human relaxin for cervical ripening.

Authors:  R J Bell; M Permezel; A MacLennan; C Hughes; D Healy; S Brennecke
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Influence of vehicle form on efficiency of prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening.

Authors:  K Skajaa; A Mamsen; N J Secher
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 9.  Prostaglandin E2 preparations for preinduction cervical ripening. Pharmacy considerations.

Authors:  F Y Nishioka
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and induction of labor.

Authors:  M Ishikawa; T Shimizu
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.862

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cost implications in the management of induction of labour.

Authors:  S J Taylor; C L Armour
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.