Literature DB >> 10146563

The worksite component of variance: design effects and the Healthy Worker Project.

S H Kelder1, D R Jacobs, R W Jeffery, P G McGovern, J L Forster.   

Abstract

Variance estimates in worksite health promotion studies depend partly on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC quantifies homogeneity of a variable within worksites. ICC would be zero for randomly formed worksites, but is generally positive because employees tend to share personal characteristics. The ratio comparing the variance estimated from worksite means with that estimated from individuals under simple random sampling is the design effect (DEFF). A DEFF of 1.0 indicates no excess variance due to worksite. The Healthy Worker Project (HWP) was a 32 worksite cross-sectional and longitudinal study of a weight and smoking intervention program. ICCs in cross-sectional surveys for health-related outcome variables ranged from 0.006 to 0.009, DEFFs from 2.0 to 2.6 ICCs/DEFF's in longitudinal analysis were smaller; ICCs ranged from -0.002 to 0.003, DEFFs from 0.7 to 1.5. Positive ICCs substantially increased variance estimates at a single measurement, yet variance of longitudinal analysis was less subject to worksite dependence. It is concluded the worksite component of variance is real and should not be ignored, although the worksite component of variance is small in these longitudinal analyses. This observation should be replicated before it is used in other worksite health promotion research.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10146563     DOI: 10.1093/her/8.4.555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  7 in total

1.  Efficient Bayesian joint models for group randomized trials with multiple observation times and multiple outcomes.

Authors:  Xinyi Xu; Michael L Pennell; Bo Lu; David M Murray
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A team level participatory approach aimed at improving sustainable employability of long-term care workers: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ceciel H Heijkants; Madelon L M van Hooff; Sabine A E Geurts; Cécile R L Boot
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.135

3.  Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Clare Rutterford; Andrew Copas; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Effectiveness of a worksite social & physical environment intervention on need for recovery, physical activity and relaxation; results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer K Coffeng; Cécile R L Boot; Saskia F A Duijts; Jos W R Twisk; Willem van Mechelen; Ingrid J M Hendriksen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The development of the Be Active & Relax "Vitality in Practice" (VIP) project and design of an RCT to reduce the need for recovery in office employees.

Authors:  Jennifer K Coffeng; Ingrid J M Hendriksen; Saskia F Duijts; Karin I Proper; Willem van Mechelen; Cécile R L Boot
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Effect and Process Evaluation of a Smartphone App to Promote an Active Lifestyle in Lower Educated Working Young Adults: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Dorien Simons; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Peter Clarys; Katrien De Cocker; Corneel Vandelanotte; Benedicte Deforche
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 7.  Clustering of continuous and binary outcomes at the general practice level in individually randomised studies in primary care - a review of 10 years of primary care trials.

Authors:  Beth Stuart; Taeko Becque; Michael Moore; Paul Little
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.