Literature DB >> 10145892

Preliminary evaluation of high-frequency chest compression for secretion clearance in mechanically ventilated patients.

J Whitman1, R Van Beusekom, S Olson, M Worm, F Indihar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A high-frequency chest compression (HFCC) device called the ThAIRapy System has been developed to provide secretion clearance therapy. We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and utility of the device in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. DESCRIPTION OF DEVICE: The primary components of the device are an air-pulse generator and an inflatable vest. Small gas volumes are alternately injected into and withdrawn from the vest by the air-pulse generator at a fast rate, creating an oscillatory or vibratory motion. The pulses cause the vest to inflate and deflate against the thorax of the patient. EVALUATION
METHODS: We evaluated HFCC by comparing it to percussion and postural drainage therapy (P&PD); sputum production, patient comfort (PC), pulse-oximetry saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) data were collected and compared between the 2 methods. We monitored the reliability of the device and distributed a survey questionnaire to the entire respiratory therapy staff to assess utility. EVALUATION
RESULTS: Nine patients completed the safety and efficacy portion of our evaluation. No significant difference was found between P&PD and HFCC in the wet weight of collected sputum, the mean change-in-percent of SpO2 or the mean percent change from baseline in HR, BP, or PC. All therapists believed that the ThAIRapy System was easy to learn, and 70% considered it an acceptable alternative to P&PD. Of the staff members surveyed, 80% believed that use of the HFCC device resulted in time savings in all or most cases. There were no equipment malfunctions in 225 hours of use.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to P&PD, HFCC via the ThAIRapy System may be equally efficacious in promoting secretion clearance in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. HFCC is neither more nor less safe for patients than is P&PD using SpO2, HR, BP, and PC as outcome variables. Most of our respiratory therapists perceived HFCC as an acceptable alternative to P&PD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10145892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review: airway hygiene in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sanja Jelic; Jennifer A Cunningham; Phillip Factor
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Instantaneous responses to high-frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with acute pneumonic respiratory failure receiving mechanical ventilation: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Ming-Lung Chuang; Yi-Ling Chou; Chai-Yuan Lee; Shih-Feng Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Evaluation of the safety of high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) therapy in blunt thoracic trauma patients.

Authors:  Casandra A Anderson; Cassandra A Palmer; Arthur L Ney; Brian Becker; Robert R Quickel; Steven D Schaffel
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2008-10-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.