INTRODUCTION: Cold stress, secondary to heat loss, can compromise infants in transport incubators during interfacility transfer. With current incubator designs, considerable radiant heat loss occurs. The use of additional external thermal insulation to reduce heat loss has been recommended for infant transports in cold environments. METHOD: A laboratory experiment was done to compare the rate of heat loss from a transport incubator with and without a commercially available, thermal insulating cover in place. The environment was a commercial freezer simulating subzero environmental temperatures. Measurements included air temperatures. inside the incubator and freezer, patterns of heater action and duration of battery power output. The significance of the different rates of cooling was compared using Pearson's r. Suboptimal battery performance was excluded by repeating one arm of the study with an external battery in place of the internal unit. RESULTS: The rate of heat loss from the incubator was: 1) significantly slower when the covered and uncovered incubators were compared (r2 = 0.52), and 2) essentially identical for the uncovered incubator with either the internal or the external battery (r2 = 0.96). CONCLUSION: In the laboratory setting, external thermal insulation slows transport incubator radiant heat loss. Clinically, this effect likely would benefit infants at risk of cold stress during interfacility transports.
INTRODUCTION: Cold stress, secondary to heat loss, can compromise infants in transport incubators during interfacility transfer. With current incubator designs, considerable radiant heat loss occurs. The use of additional external thermal insulation to reduce heat loss has been recommended for infant transports in cold environments. METHOD: A laboratory experiment was done to compare the rate of heat loss from a transport incubator with and without a commercially available, thermal insulating cover in place. The environment was a commercial freezer simulating subzero environmental temperatures. Measurements included air temperatures. inside the incubator and freezer, patterns of heater action and duration of battery power output. The significance of the different rates of cooling was compared using Pearson's r. Suboptimal battery performance was excluded by repeating one arm of the study with an external battery in place of the internal unit. RESULTS: The rate of heat loss from the incubator was: 1) significantly slower when the covered and uncovered incubators were compared (r2 = 0.52), and 2) essentially identical for the uncovered incubator with either the internal or the external battery (r2 = 0.96). CONCLUSION: In the laboratory setting, external thermal insulation slows transport incubator radiant heat loss. Clinically, this effect likely would benefit infants at risk of cold stress during interfacility transports.