Literature DB >> 10139421

Cost-effectiveness analysis of health care services, and concepts of distributive justice.

G J van der Wilt1.   

Abstract

Two answers to the question 'how can we allocate health care resources fairly?' are introduced and discussed. Both utilitarian and egalitarian approaches are found relevant, but both exhibit considerable theoretical and practical difficulties. Neither seems capable of solving the problem on its own. It is suggested that, for practical purposes, a version of Rawls' famous thought experiment might provide at least some enlightenment about which theoretical approach should be used to address the question.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10139421     DOI: 10.1007/BF02251075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  6 in total

1.  Rationing fairly: programmatic considerations.

Authors:  Norman Daniels
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 2.  Oregon's experiment.

Authors:  M Brannigan
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1993-06

3.  The strange quest for the health gain.

Authors:  M Loughlin
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1993-11

4.  Autonomy and the common weal.

Authors:  M Danis; L R Churchill
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Estimating costs in the economic evaluation of medical technologies.

Authors:  B R Luce; A Elixhauser
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Allocating resources.

Authors:  M F Drummond
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: a transdisciplinary study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gibson; Douglas K Martin; Peter A Singer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.