Literature DB >> 10139084

An introduction to benchmarking in healthcare.

H R Benson1.   

Abstract

Benchmarking--the process of establishing a standard of excellence and comparing a business function or activity, a product, or an enterprise as a whole with that standard--will be used increasingly by healthcare institutions to reduce expenses and simultaneously improve product and service quality. As a component of total quality management, benchmarking is a continuous process by which an organization can measure and compare its own processes with those of organizations that are leaders in a particular area. Benchmarking should be viewed as a part of quality management programs, not as a replacement. There are four kinds of benchmarking: internal, competitive, functional and generic. With internal benchmarking, functions within an organization are compared with each other. Competitive benchmarking partners do business in the same market and provide a direct comparison of products or services. Functional and generic benchmarking are performed with organizations which may have a specific similar function, such as payroll or purchasing, but which otherwise are in a different business. Benchmarking must be a team process because the outcome will involve changing current practices, with effects felt throughout the organization. The team should include members who have subject knowledge; communications and computer proficiency; skills as facilitators and outside contacts; and sponsorship of senior management. Benchmarking requires quantitative measurement of the subject. The process or activity that you are attempting to benchmark will determine the types of measurements used. Benchmarking metrics usually can be classified in one of four categories: productivity, quality, time and cost-related.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10139084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Manage        ISSN: 0198-7097


  9 in total

1.  Experience measuring performance improvement in multiphase picture archiving and communications systems implementations.

Authors:  G Reed; D H Reed
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A Six-Sigma approach for comparing diagnostic errors in healthcare-where does laboratory medicine stand?

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Mario Plebani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

3.  Exploring the Pathways Revealed by International Sepsis Benchmarking.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis.

Authors:  Janine Owens; Karina Lovell; Abigail Brown; Penny Bee
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.144

5.  Benchmarking the use of blood products in cardiac surgery to stimulate awareness of transfusion behaviour : Results from a four-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  C Brouwers; B Hooftman; S Vonk; A Vonk; W Stooker; W H Te Gussinklo; R M Wesselink; C Wagner; M C de Bruijne
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Assessing electronic immunization registries: the Pan American Health Organization experience.

Authors:  M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday; Marcela P Contreras; Dalys Pinto; Ida Berenice Molina-Aguilera; Diana Miranda; Odalys García; Martha Velandia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 7.  Leukodepleted Packed Red Blood Cells Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Cardiovascular Surgical Procedure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Simancas-Racines; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Gerard Urrutia; Diana Buitrago-Garcia; Solange Núñez-González; María José Martínez-Zapata; Eva Madrid; Xavier Bonfill; Ricardo Hidalgo-Ottolenghi
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  Gaining an accurate reflection of the reality of palliative care through the use of free-text feedback in questionnaires: the AFTER study.

Authors:  Anna Victoria Bowyer; Ilora Finlay; Jessica Baillie; Anthony Byrne; Jacqui McCarthy; Catherine Sampson; Veronica Snow; Annmarie Nelson
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.568

9.  Testing the Use of Data Drawn from the Electronic Health Record to Compare Quality.

Authors:  Kathleen E Walsh; Hanieh Razzaghi; David M Hartley; Levon Utidjian; Shannon Alford; Rahul A Darwar; Elizabeth Shenkman; Susannah Jonas; Mary Goodick; Jonathan Finkelstein; Al Ozonoff; L Vandy Black; Michael Shapiro; Kathryn Shaw; Jennifer McCafferty-Fernandez; Keith Marsolo; Amy Kelly; Lloyd N Werk; Jordan Smallwood; Charles Bailey
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2021-07-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.