Literature DB >> 10135103

Point and counterpoint. Should HECs make de facto binding decisions?

L L Brunetti, W J Ellos.   

Abstract

It is evident that HEC decisions are de facto binding. Our challenge is to recognize the implications of these decisions for patient care. As a result of the passage of the Patient Self-Determination Act and the recent JCAHO rules mandating dispute resolving mechanisms for ethical issues, case review by ethics committees will undoubtedly have an even greater influence on patient care. Therefore, health care institutions and their medical staffs must strive to find the best way to use the inherent powers of hospital ethics committees to enhance patient care decisionmaking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10135103     DOI: 10.1007/BF01463652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  10 in total

1.  The epistemology and ethics of consensus: uses and misuses of 'ethical' expertise.

Authors:  R Tong
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1991-08

2.  Does legislating hospital ethics committees make a difference? A study of hospital ethics committees in Maryland, the District of Columbia, and Virginia.

Authors:  D E Hoffmann
Journal:  Law Med Health Care       Date:  1991 Spring-Summer

3.  What means this consensus? Ethics committees and philosophic tradition.

Authors:  J D Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1990

4.  Ethics by committee: the moral authority of consensus.

Authors:  J D Moreno
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1988-11

5.  Ethics committees: decisions by bureaucracy.

Authors:  M Siegler
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Ethics committees and decisions to limit care. The experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  T A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Hospital ethics committees. Administrative aspects.

Authors:  N Fost; R E Cranford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Impact of medical ethics consultations on physicians: an exploratory study.

Authors:  H S Perkins; B S Saathoff
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Community hospital ethics consultation: evaluation and comparison with a university hospital service.

Authors:  J La Puma; C B Stocking; C M Darling; M Siegler
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital. Utilization and evaluation.

Authors:  J La Puma; C B Stocking; M D Silverstein; A DiMartini; M Siegler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.