Literature DB >> 10134359

The spare embryo--a red herring in the embryo experimentation debate.

S Holm1.   

Abstract

Whenever embryo experimentation is discussed, the question of whether it is preferable to use spare or specifically produced ('research') embryos for destructive embryo experimentation always enters the debate at some stage. This question is analysed, and it is suggested that the distinction is morally uninteresting, but rhetorically useful for both sides in the debate. It is further suggested that part of the force of this distinction is caused by the fact that it is parasitic on a real moral distinction based on the degree to which the gametes used in the experiment are obtained by explicit or implicit coercion.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10134359     DOI: 10.1007/BF02196973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  1 in total

1.  Making women visible in the embryo experimentation debate.

Authors:  Robyn Rowland
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.898

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  The use of empirical evidence in formulating reproductive policy advice and policy.

Authors:  Søren Holm; Thomas Ploug
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

2.  Biobanking human embryonic stem cell lines: policy, ethics and efficiency.

Authors:  Søren Holm
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-12

3.  Fresh embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research: the experiences and values of IVF couples asked to be embryo donors.

Authors:  E Haimes; K Taylor
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  The contributions of empirical evidence to socio-ethical debates on fresh embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell research.

Authors:  Erica Haimes; Ken Taylor
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 1.898

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.