Literature DB >> 10124437

Hospital and Medicare financial performance under PPS, 1985-90.

C R Fisher1.   

Abstract

Although an increasing number of hospitals are reporting net losses from the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient care, overall hospital facility profit rates remain stable. Hospitals that reported net profits in the Medicare inpatient PPS sector in PPS 7 (1990) had smaller increases in Medicare expenses than hospitals that reported PPS losses in PPS 7. Medicare PPS inpatient net losses in PPS 7 were more than offset by non-Medicare net profits. Even though Medicare PPS revenues grew more slowly than the gross domestic product from 1985 to 1990, other hospital revenues grew more rapidly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10124437      PMCID: PMC4193316     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev        ISSN: 0195-8631


Introduction

The prospective payment system (PPS), designed mainly as a fixed price per discharge payment system, provides incentives to restrain inpatient care costs by encouraging hospitals to manage their services and costs efficiently. In this article I examine total hospital facility and Medicare inpatient PPS financial and utilization trends in hospitals that were under PPS continuously from the PPS 2 period (roughly 1985) through the PPS 7 period (roughly 1990) in order to determine the impact of PPS. Also examined in this article are general trends in revenues, expenses, and net profits for different hospital sectors; factors determining cost increases in these sectors, including costs of input resources, real outputs of goods and services, and total factor productivity rates; and how hospitals cope, or do not cope, under the restraints imposed by limits in Medicare PPS revenue growth and rising costs. Data on gross and net revenues, expenses, and net profits were derived from a longitudinally linked file of Medicare cost reports for 4,653 hospitals for all cost report years PPS 2 (1985) through PPS 7 (1990). Only those hospitals that were continuously under PPS during the entire period were selected. Discharge data from Medicare's billing system were added to obtain case weight and charge information, and, where possible, employee data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey were also added. Thus, omitted were PPS excluded hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, hospitals in States that had a waiver (i.e., providers in Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Puerto Rico), newly established hospitals that joined PPS after PPS 2, and hospitals that terminated business before PPS 7. Hospital disclosures are discussed by Williams, Hadley, and Pettingill (1992). Medicare cost-reporting periods do not coincide with either calendar year or Federal fiscal year periods. Therefore, the characterization of PPS 2 data as applicable to 1985 and PPS 7 data as applicable to 1990 is only approximate. PPS 2 data represent cost report periods that began on or after October 1, 1984, and before October 1, 1985. PPS 7 data represent cost report periods that began on or after October 1, 1989, and before October 1, 1990. In the analysis (Tables 4-9), the focus is on average annual rates of change during the PPS 2 through PPS 7 period to minimize the effects of mixing data from Medicare provider cost report years with data from the AHA Annual Survey years and other price and cost information for Federal fiscal years.
Table 4

Constant (1985) dollar value of real outputs, by type of facility sector and by hospital Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) profit status: PPS 2 and PPS 7

Type of facility sector and yearTotal facility sectorMedicare PPS inpatient sectorMedicare outpatient sectorNon-Medicare sector
All hospitals
PPS 7 current dollar amount$55,222,315$17,374,500$2,730,527$35,117,288
PPS 2 current dollar amount27,902,3759,855,864892,81217,153,699
PPS 7 constant dollar amount36,467,28811,481,2201,795,76323,190,305
PPS 2 constant dollar amount27,902,3759,855,864892,81217,153,699
Average annual percent change PPS 2 to PPS 7 (constant dollar)5.53.115.06.2
Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7
PPS 7 current dollar amount59,834,96317,447,1642,717,88039,669,919
PPS 2 current dollar amount30,861,7189,934,936958,00719,968,775
PPS 7 constant dollar amount39,576,16211,573,3321,788,62126,214,209
PPS 2 constant dollar amount30,861,7189,934,936958,00719,968,775
Average annual percent change PPS 2 to PPS 7 (constant dollar)5.13.113.35.6
Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and Medicare PPS losses in PPS 7
PPS 7 current dollar amount62,986,63020,822,2743,222,94438,941,412
PPS 2 current dollar amount31,346,79511,772,1521,014,11818,560,526
PPS 7 constant dollar amount41,751,58313,780,1632,120,82825,850,592
PPS 2 constant dollar amount31,346,79511,772,1521,014,11818,560,526
Average annual percent change PPS 2 to PPS 7 (constant dollar)5.93.215.96.9
Hospitals with Medicare PPS losses in PPS 2 and in PPS 7
PPS 7 current dollar amount23,420,6577,661,5801,385,87314,373,204
PPS 2 current dollar amount11,826,8424,252,632412,7857,161,425
PPS 7 constant dollar amount15,457,2095,050,793912,7709,493,646
PPS 2 constant dollar amount11,826,8424,252,632412,7857,161,425
Average annual percent change PPS 2 to PPS 7 (constant dollar)5.53.517.25.8

Constant dollar value cited in 1985 (roughly PPS 2) dollars.

NOTE: For definition of PPS 2 and PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCES: Health Care Financing Administration: Medicare Cost Reports and Bureau of Labor Statistics: Consumer Price Index Hospital List Prices.

Table 9

Average annual percent changes in nominal amounts, real amounts, and output prices for gross domestic product, total hospital facility revenues, medicare inpatient prospective payment system (PPS) revenues, and all other hospital facility revenues: PPS 2 (1985) and PPS 7 (1990)

ItemNominal amountReal amountOutput transaction price
Gross domestic product6.42.73.6
Total hospital facility revenues9.25.53.4
Medicare inpatient PPS revenues5.03.11.8
All other hospital facility revenues10.96.44.2

NOTE: For definition of PPS 2 and PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCES: Gross domestic product nominal and price changes were obtained from the Economic Report to the President, 1992. Hospital revenue and price data were derived by the Health Care Financing Administration.

To clearly focus on key factors underlying financial trends, three categories of hospitals from the 4,653 hospitals were defined based on the hospitals' Medicare PPS inpatient profit status in PPS 2 and PPS 7 (Table 1):
Table 1

Number of hospitals in the total facility sector and the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) inpatient sector, by profit status: 1985 and 1990

Medicare PPS sectorMedicare PPS sector totalTotal facility sector

Net profits in 1990Net losses in 1990


Net profits in 1985Net losses in 1985Net profits in 1985Net losses in 1985
Total4,6532,745626848434
Net profits in 1990
Net profits in 19851,6921,15721422992
Net losses in 198520147961840
Net losses in 1990
Net profits in 19852,2421,387195486174
Net losses in 1985518154121115128

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration: Data from the Medicare Cost Reports.

Category one hospitals (1,692) with Medicare PPS inpatient profits in PPS 2 and with Medicare PPS inpatient profits in PPS 7. Category two hospitals (2,242) with Medicare PPS inpatient profits in PPS 2 and Medicare PPS inpatient losses in PPS 7. Category three hospitals (518) with Medicare inpatient losses in PPS 2 and Medicare inpatient losses in PPS 7. These three categories of hospitals accounted for over 99 percent of all revenues for hospitals in 1990. Data were included for 201 additional hospitals that reported Medicare PPS inpatient profits in PPS 7 and Medicare PPS inpatient losses in PPS 2 in the total but not as a separate category.

Revenues, expenses, and net profits

Fewer hospitals reported positive overall facility profits in PPS 7 than in PPS 2. Of the 4,653 hospitals, 72.4 percent reported overall facility profits in PPS 7, a decrease from 77.2 percent in PPS 2 but an increase from 67.4 percent in PPS 4. In the same period, the proportion of hospitals with Medicare PPS inpatient profits dropped steadily from 84.5 percent to 40.7 percent (Table 2).
Table 2

Percent distribution of prospective payment system (PPS) hospitals, by total hospital facility profit status and by Medicare inpatient PPS profit status: PPS 2 (1985) through PPS 7 (1990)

Year and Medicare inpatient PPS profit statusTotal facility profit status

TotalNet profitsNet losses
PPS 7
Total100.072.427.6
Net profits40.732.58.1
Net losses59.339.919.4
PPS 6
Total100.070.929.1
Net profits46.837.09.8
Net losses53.233.919.3
PPS 5
Total100.068.931.1
Net profits54.943.511.4
Net losses45.125.419.7
PPS 4
Total100.067.432.6
Net profits62.547.914.5
Net losses37.519.418.1
PPS 3
Total100.069.230.8
Net profits70.455.315.2
Net losses29.613.915.6
PPS 2
Total100.077.222.8
Net profits84.570.014.5
Net losses15.57.28.3

This table represents 4,653 hospitals continuously under the prospective payment system (PPS) for the entire period PPS 2 (1985) through PPS 7 (1990). Data are excluded for providers in the States of Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York.

NOTE: For definition of PPS 2 through PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administraton: Data from the Medicare Cost Reports.

Hospital net revenues increased more slowly than expenses for all categories of hospitals during the PPS 2 through PPS 7 period as net profit rates declined (Table 3). Generally, overall facility profit rates were higher in hospitals with positive Medicare PPS inpatient net profits. However, increasing net profits in the non-Medicare sectors helped hospitals with Medicare PPS inpatient sector losses to maintain levels of net profit comparable to those reported by hospitals in the pre-PPS period. Trends by type of Medicare PPS inpatient profit status differed:
Table 3

Amounts and percent change per prospective payment system (PPS) hospital of net revenues, expenses, and net profits, by selected sectors: PPS 2 (1985) to PPS 7 (1990)

Sector and yearAll hospitals

Net revenueExpensesNet profits



AmountPercent changeAmountPercent changeAmountPercent of net revenues
Total facility sector
PPS 7$37,179,11411.1$35,391,38511.4$1,787,7294.8
PPS 633,463,35511.431,765,26911.41,698,0865.1
PPS 530,045,80610.328,519,0259.91,526,7805.1
PPS 427,249,4597.225,940,9098.51,308,5504.8
PPS 325,424,9586.023,902,2367.91,522,7226.0
PPS 223,996,15622,154,7321,841,4247.7
Medicare inpatient sector
PPS 79,962,2987.310,225,39910.2(363,101)−3.7
PPS 69,194,0168.59,282,03612.2(88,045)−1.0
PPS 58,470,6435.98,269,4879.3200,9502.4
PPS 47,995,6993.17,562,4336.8433,1765.4
PPS 37,752,4920.57,079,7716.0672,7368.7
PPS 27,712,8716,677,5581,035,26613.4
Medicare outpatient sector
PPS 71,467,56718.11,467,56718.100.0
PPS 61,242,32318.71,242,32318.700.0
PPS 51,046,97218.81,046,97218.800.0
PPS 4880,94718.1880,94718.100.0
PPS 3745,95419.8745,95419.800.0
PPS 2622,760622,76000.0
Non-Medicare sector
PPS 725,849,24812.323,698,41911.62,150,8298.3
PPS 623,026,83212.221,240,70110.61,786,1327.8
PPS 520,526,07111.719,200,2419.71,325,8306.5
PPS 418,371,4698.517,496,0948.8875,3754.8
PPS 316,926,9858.116,076,9998.2849,9875.0
PPS 215,662,13614,855,978806,1575.1
Total facility sectorCategory 1: Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7
PPS 7$40,601,67812.2$38,446,64711.4$2,155,0315.3
PPS 636,184,99611.134,505,85411.21,679,1424.6
PPS 532,559,1588.931,033,0438.91,526,1154.7
PPS 429,904,7386.828,489,2018.41,415,5374.7
PPS 328,008,8846.126,285,0768.11,723,8086.2
PPS 226,403,69724,323,0922,080,6057.9
Medicare inpatient sector
PPS 710,964,3319.110,110,7829.6853,5497.8
PPS 610,047,1308.89,226,23911.5823,6658.2
PPS 59,236,6286.48,270,0117.2967,47510.5
PPS 48,680,2544.57,711,2386.6969,49911.2
PPS 38,306,6250.37,238,3265.41,068,74212.9
PPS 28,284,1546,863,1791,421,45717.2
Medicare outpatient sector
PPS 71,485,30414.71,485,30414.700.0
PPS 61,294,41117.81,294,41117.800.0
PPS 51,099,13517.31,099,13517.300.0
PPS 4936,69915.6936,69915.600.0
PPS 3810,54718.0810,54718.000.0
PPS 2687,036687,03600.0
Non-Medicare sector
PPS 7$28,152,04313.3$26,850,56111.9$1,301,4824.6
PPS 624,842,95811.823,987,48110.7855,4773.4
PPS 522,223,0669.521,664,4269.2558,6402.5
PPS 420,285,7967.419,839,7588.8446,0382.2
PPS 318,892,6838.418,237,6178.7655,0673.5
PPS 217,431,99916,772,851659,1483.8
Total facility sectorCategory 2: Hospitals with Medicare profits in PPS 2 and Medicare losses in PPS 7
PPS 7$42,083,87810.9$40,149,38011.6$1,934,4984.6
PPS 637,955,84811.035,974,54311.51,981,3055.2
PPS 534,209,62311.232,277,42710.71,932,1965.6
PPS 430,756,5416.929,148,2178.31,608,3245.2
PPS 328,764,2656.126,924,7068.21,839,5596.4
PPS 227,103,53024,882,2732,221,2578.2
Medicare inpatient sector
PPS 711,065,2136.012,335,01710.8(1,269,804)−11.5
PPS 610,435,1408.211,133,08812.7(697,704)−6.7
PPS 59,647,3365.49,885,85510.7(238,153)−2.5.
PPS 49,154,8541.98,924,0046.9231,6352.5
PPS 38,985,4170.98,350,3807.3636,1897.1
PPS 28,906,1007,782,9591,123,69312.6
Medicare outpatient sector
PPS 71,707,68220.31,707,68220.300.0
PPS 61,419,10819.51,419,10819.500.0
PPS 51,187,90119.71,187,90119.700.0
PPS 4992,35718.6992,35718.600.0
PPS 3836,90921.0836,90921.000.0
PPS 2691,936691,93600.0
Non-Medicare sector
PPS 729,310,98312.326,106,68111.53,204,30210.9
PPS 626,098,63411.623,419,62610.42,679,00910.3
PPS 523,376,14213.421,205,79310.32,170,3499.3
PPS 420,606,8188.819,230,1288.41,376,6896.7
PPS 318,940,9688.217,737,5988.11,203,3716.4
PPS 217,506,78816,409,2241,097,5646.3
Total facility sectorCategory 3: Hospitals with Medicare PPS losses in PPS 2 and Medicare PPS losses in PPS 7
PPS 7$15,875,9208.0$15,425,5318.6$450,3892.8
PPS 614,699,55412.614,206,21310.7493,3413.4
PPS 513,059,33811.212,837,9869.8221,3521.7
PPS 411,739,53911.011,693,63511.745,9040.4
PPS 310,573,0565.210,464,7695.3108,2871.0
PPS 210,051,2349,936,150115,0841.1
Medicare inpatient sector
PPS 74,008,2215.04,670,5428.0(662,321)−16.5
PPS 63,817,4949.54,326,55012.4(509,056)−13.3
PPS 53,487,0849.03,847,91910.8(360,835)−10.3
PPS 43,199,3675.53,472,0458.0(272,678)−8.5
PPS 33,031,520−0.63,214,7320.2(183,211)−6.0
PPS 23,048,4513,207,956(159,505)−5.2
Medicare outpatient sector
PPS 7763,66616.8763,66616.800.0
PPS 6653,77818.0653,77818.000.0
PPS 5554,28320.8554,28320.800.0
PPS 4458,91127.8458,91127.800.0
PPS 3359,07223.9359,07223.900.0
PPS 2289,757289,75700.0
Non-Medicare sector
PPS 711,104,0338.69,991,3238.31,112,71010.0
PPS 610,228,28213.49,225,8849.41,002,3989.8
PPS 59,017,97111.69,435,7848.7582,1876.5
PPS 48,081,26112.57,762,67912.7318,5823.9
PPS 37,182,4647.06,890,9657.0291,4994.1
PPS 26,713,0266,438,437274,5894.1

NOTE: For definitiion of PPS 2 through PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration: Data from the Medicare Cost Reports.

Category one hospitals reported higher rates of increase in Medicare PPS revenues than category two hospitals. Category two hospitals reported higher rates of increase in Medicare PPS expenses than the other two categories. Category three hospitals reported relatively high rates of increase in Medicare PPS revenues and relatively low rates of increase in Medicare PPS expenses, but neither trend was sufficient to provide them with Medicare PPS profits during the period. These hospitals began their PPS experience with losses when most hospitals were reporting substantial profits under PPS. Their subsequent performance under PPS indicates that, despite relatively rapid increases in their Medicare PPS revenues and their relatively effective restraints on costs, these hospitals have never been able to register profits under PPS.

Determinants of trends in expenses

Hospital expenses are defined by the accounting identity: where real outputs are defined as all patient care goods and services that appear on bills submitted to patients by hospitals; (expenses/inputs), sometimes called the hospital input price index, is defined as average costs per unit of resource input (including labor, capital, and other material input resources); productivity is defined as the ratio of real outputs to all factors of production. This measure of productivity is, therefore, called a “total factor” productivity measure.

Real output trends

Medicare PPS inpatient real outputs, as measured in PPS 2 (1985) constant gross revenue dollars, increased at about the same rate for category one hospitals and for category two hospitals. Non-Medicare sector real output growth was slowest for category one hospitals and fastest for category two hospitals (Table 4). Medicare outpatient sector real outputs increased very rapidly for all hospital sectors during the study period but was highest in the category three hospitals.

Hospital input price index

Expenses per unit of input resource vary with labor compensation costs, capital costs, and other material costs. I have assumed that differences in changes in the cost of input resources by hospital category are attributable to changes in average labor compensation costs (i.e., average payroll costs and average benefit costs per full-time equivalent worker [FTE]). Therefore, it was assumed also that changes in unit costs for non-labor input resources (i.e., capital and other non-capital input resources) were the same as the national rate of change for all categories of hospitals. A hospital input price index, which the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) routinely prepares for the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce, was used to represent changes in non-compensation unit costs (the BEA Index). Average annual salaries and benefits per FTE worker increased fastest in category two hospitals (Table 5). Category three hospitals reported the lowest levels of salaries and benefits and the lowest increases in compensation.
Table 5

Total compensation, wages and salaries, and benefits per full-time equivalent employees, by Medicare profit status: PPS 2 (1985) and PPS 7 (1990)

Sector and yearTotal compensationWages and salariesBenefits
All hospitals
PPS 7$30,845$25,761$5,084
PPS 223,60319,8513,751
Average annual percent change5.55.46.3
Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7
PPS 7$30,932$25,908$5,023
PPS 223,84220,0733,769
Average annual percent change5.35.25.9
Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and Medicare PPS losses in PPS 7
PPS 7$31,107$25,944$5,163
PPS 223,57719,8143,763
Average annual percent change5.75.56.5
Hospitals with Medicare PPS losses in PPS 2 and in PPS 7
PPS 7$28,883$23,928$4,955
PPS 222,58119,0083,573
Average annual percent change5.04.76.8

NOTES: PPS is prospective payment system. For defintion of PPS 2 and PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration and American Hospital Association: Linked Medicare Cost Report and annual survey files.

Combining rates of change in compensation with national rates of change in other input resource unit costs (using weights from the BEA Index) yields an overall index of change in input prices (Table 6). Changes in this combined input price index by category of hospital thus represent a measure of variation in input prices by category of hospital where sources of variation are solely the result of compensation differences.
Table 6

Average annual percent change in input price index, by prospective payment system (PPS) hospital profit status: PPS 2 (1985) and PPS 7 (1990)

Profit statusTotalCompensationNon-compensation1
All hospitals5.05.54.2
Category 124.95.34.2
Category 235.15.74.2
Category 344.75.04.2

Non-compensation component of hospital input price indexes prepared by the Health Care Financing Administration for the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net profits in PPS 2 and net losses in PPS 7.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net losses in PPS 2 and PPS 7.

NOTE: For definition of PPS 2 and PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration: Linked Medicare Cost Reports, and annual surveys; American Hospital Association (AHA): The AHA Survey payroll, benefit, and full-time-equivalent worker data.

Productivity rates

The rates of change in total factor productivity are derived as a residual amount from the preceding definition of expenses. Total factor productivity is defined as the ratio of all hospital outputs to all units of factor inputs, including labor, capital, and materials. Because changes in expenses, real outputs, and input prices can be estimated, total factor productivity rate changes are determined as a residual amount from the accounting identity (Table 7).
Table 7

Average annual ratio changes in expenses and expense determinants, by type of facility sector and type of Medicare inpatient prospective payment system (PPS) profit status: PPS 2 (1985) and PPS 7 (1990)

Sector and PPS inpatient profit statusAverage annual changes in:

Expense=Real outputs×Inputs price index/Productivity rate
Total facility sector
All hospitals1.0981.0551.0501.009
Category 121.0961.0511.0491.006
Category 231.1001.0591.0511.012
Category 341.0921.0551.0471.011
Medicare inpatient PPS sector
All hospitals1.0891.0311.0500.994
Category 121.0811.0311.0491.000
Category 231.0961.0321.0510.990
Category 341.0781.0351.0471.005
Medicare outpatient hospital sector
All hospitals1.1871.1501.0501.017
Category 121.1671.1331.0491.018
Category 231.1981.1591.0511.107
Category 341.2141.1721.0471.011
Non-Medicare sector
All hospitals1.0981.0621.0501.015
Category 121.0991.0581.0491.010
Category 231.0971.0691.0511.024
Category 341.0921.0581.0471.014

Expenses are defined by the identity: Expenses equal real outputs multiplied by input prices divided by total factor productivity rates.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net profits in PPS 2 and net losses in PPS 7.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net losses in PPS 2 and PPS 7.

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration: Office of the Actuary.

Sources of expenses by hospital category

Hospital expenses change by type of Medicare PPS inpatient profit status and by type of facilities sector. Because it is assumed that changes in the hospital input price index are the same by type of facilities sector (but not by type of Medicare PPS inpatient profit status), sources of increase in expenses by facilities sector derive from increases in real outputs and/or from decreases in total factor productivity rates. In this section, I provide an hypothesis on changes in key determinants of hospital expenses by category of Medicare inpatient PPS profit status and by sector within the hospital. In the Medicare PPS inpatient sector, expenses rose more rapidly in the category two hospitals than in the category one hospitals primarily because of larger declines in productivity rates and higher input prices (Table 7). By contrast, expenses for category two hospitals rose more slowly than for the category one hospitals in the non-Medicare sector because productivity rates there were substantially higher (Figure 1). This apparently anomalous productivity performance in category two hospitals may be the result of cost-shifting from the non-Medicare sector to the Medicare inpatient PPS sector.
Figure 1

Percent changes in productivity rates, by selected hospital prospective payment system (PPS) profit category and selected hospital sector: 1985-90

Cost-shifting to the Medicare inpatient PPS sector occurs when cost reports by hospitals to the Medicare program allocate resources to the Medicare inpatient sector that were actually used in the non-Medicare sector. Ashby (1992) compared Medicare inpatient costs derived from Medicare cost reports with costs derived from advanced hospital accounting systems. This analysis found that the Medicare cost reports overstated Medicare inpatient routine and special-care unit costs by 12.6 percent and understated Medicare inpatient ancillary costs by 4.9 percent. Total Medicare inpatient costs were overstated 4.4 percent. In a parallel study (Center for Health Policy Studies, 1990), outpatient costs were found to be overstated, a finding that confirms Ashby's (1992) conclusion that Medicare inpatient ancillary costs are understated. These studies show that the Medicare inpatient expenses for the inpatient and outpatient sectors may be understated and, therefore, the net profits (losses) may be larger (smaller) than the amounts shown. The basic reason for the overall decline in Medicare PPS inpatient profits is the rapid increase in costs per unit of output compared with slower increases in output transaction prices (output transaction prices are defined as net revenues divided by real outputs as shown in Table 8). Changes in output transaction prices exceeded changes in costs per output in the non-Medicare sector thus offsetting losses in the Medicare sector and maintaining overall facility net profit rates.
Table 8

Average annual percent changes in expenses per real output and output transaction prices, by category of Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) inpatient profit status: PPS 2 (1985) and PPS 7 (1990)

Sector and profit statusAverage annual percent changes in:

Expenses per unit of outputOutput transaction prices
Total facility sector
All hospitals4.13.4
Category 114.33.7
Category 223.93.1
Category 333.53.9
Medicare inpatient PPS sector
All hospitals5.61.9
Category 114.82.6
Category 226.21.2
Category 334.22.1
Medicare outpatient hospital sector
All hospitals3.23.2
Category 113.03.0
Category 223.43.4
Category 333.63.6
Non-Medicare sector
All hospitals3.44.1
Category 113.94.3
Category 222.63.7
Category 333.24.5

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net profits in PPS 2 and net losses in PPS 7.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net losses in PPS 2 and PPS 7.

NOTE: For definition of PPS 2 and PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration: Office of the Actuary.

Industry and general economy growth

Medicare PPS inpatient sector expenditures for the hospitals in this study grew less rapidly than GDP during the study period, despite a more rapid increase in real outputs, because changes in output transaction prices for this sector were kept well below general economy price increases (Table 9). By contrast, both real outputs and output transaction prices in all other hospital sectors rose more rapidly, thus causing a rate of growth in total hospital expenditures that exceeded general economic growth (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Factors of growth for gross domestic product, Medicare inpatient prospective payment system (PPS), and other hospital sectors: 1985–90

Medicare revenues and expenses per discharge

Although the number of Medicare discharges per hospital changed minimally during the study period, revenues per discharge and the distribution of revenues per discharge by type of revenue source changed markedly by Medicare PPS inpatient profit status as shown by comparisons between category one hospitals and category two hospitals (Table 10). Category one hospitals reported:
Table 10

Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) inpatient discharges, payments per discharge, and percent distribution of payments, by type of payment and by Medicare inpatient PPS profit status: PPS 2 and PPS 7

Payments per discharge
Total
DRG payment
Outlier paymentCapital pass- throughDirect medical
Indirect Medical
Disproportionate
Profit status and yearNumber of discharges per hospitalAmountAnnual percent changeAmountAnnual Percent change
Education AmountEducation AmountShare AmountOther amount1
All hospitalsDollar amount per discharge
PPS 71,782$4,5344.9$4,3653.5$163$507$112$221$152$14
PPS 21,7724,3523,6795738388122221
Percent distribution
PPS 7100.078.92.9 9.22.04.02.80.2
PPS 2100.084.51.3 8.82.02.80.00.5
Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7Dollar amount per discharge
PPS 71,8495,9295.64,5253.814645716735425822
PPS 21,8324,5223,75558356133197321
Percent distribution
PPS 7100.076.32.5 7.72.86.04.40.4
PPS 2100.083.01.3 7.92.94.40.10.5
Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and Medicare PPS losses in PPS 7Dollar amount per discharge
PPS 72,0425,4194.44,3563.1182452851568910
PPS 22,0364,3733,739594006685123
Percent distribution
PPS 7100.080.43.410.01.62.91.60.2
PPS 2100.085.51.49.11.51.90.00.5
Hospitals with Medicare PPS losses in PPS 2 and in PPS 7Dollar amount per discharge
PPS 78944,4845.53,6764.7130553243271(2)
PPS 28883,4332,926474151816010
Percent distribution
PPS 7100.082.02.912.30.50.71.6−0.1
PPS 2100.085.21.412.10.50.50.00.3

Includes kidney acquisition pass-through costs, high end stage renal disease use amounts, returns to equity, and sequestration offsets.

NOTES: DRG is diagnosis-related group. For definition of PPS 2 and PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration: Medicare Cost Reports.

More rapid increases in diagnosis-related group (DRG) payments (the prospective payments portion of inpatient Medicare revenues). DRG payments per discharge increased 3.8 percent annually compared with 3.1 percent annually for the category two hospitals. Larger increases in revenues other than DRG payments, particularly direct and indirect medical education amounts and disproportionate share amounts. Between PPS 2 and PPS 7, DRG payments declined from 83 percent to 76 percent of total Medicare revenues for category one hospitals as payments from non-DRG sources increased. Although category two hospitals also received relatively more revenues from non-DRG sources, the amounts were substantially less per discharge. As previously discussed, Medicare PPS inpatient expenses for category one hospitals rose more slowly than expenses for category two hospitals. In PPS 2, expenses per discharge were $76 higher in the category two hospitals, a difference that grew to $574 by PPS 7, an additional $498 per discharge (Table 11). It is estimated that about three-fifths of this additional expense was because of relative declines in total factor productivity rates in the category two hospitals. If the cost increases in the category two hospitals had been the same as category one hospitals, then category two hospitals' average net loss per discharge would have been $159 (2.9 percent of net revenues) instead of $622 (11.5 percent of net revenues) in PPS 7. If category one hospitals had incurred the same average expenses as the category two hospitals, their net Medicare PPS profits would have averaged $8 per discharge (0.1 percent of net revenues) instead of $442 (7.5 percent of net revenues) observed in PPS 7.
Table 11

Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) inpatient discharges, expenses per discharge, and percent distribution of expenses, by type of expense and by Medicare Inpatient PPS profit status: PPS 2 (1985) and PPS 7 (1990)

Profit status and yearTotal costOperating costsCapital-related ExpensesDirect medical educational expensesKidney acquisition cost pass-throughMalpractice expense

AmountAnnual percent change
All hospitalsDollar amount per discharge
PPS 7$5,7388.8$4,979$589$128$18$25
PPS 23,7673,26738388921
Percent distribution
PPS 7100.086.810.32.20.30.4
PPS 2100.086.710.22.30.20.5
Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7Dollar amount per discharge
PPS 75,4677.94,6935311942524
PPS 23,7463,2253561331419
Percent distribution
PPS 7100.085.89.73.60.50.4
PPS 2100.086.19.53.50.40.5
Hospitals with Medicare PPS profits in PPS 2 and Medicare PPS losses in PPS 7Dollar amount per discharge
PPS 76,0419.65,276630941526
PPS 23,8223,32840066621
Percent distribution
PPS 7100.087.310.41.60.20.4
PPS 2100.087.110.51.70.20.6
Hospitals with Medicare PPS losses in PPS 2 and in PPS 7Dollar amount per discharge
PPS 75,2257.74,53164128124
PPS 23,6133,15541518025
Percent distribution
PPS 7100.086.712.30.50.00.5
PPS 2100.087.311.50.50.00.7

Includes estimated Graduate Education Program costs.

NOTE: For definition of PPS 2 and PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration: Medicare Cost Reports.

Two alternative hypotheses about the differences in Medicare PPS inpatient expense increases between the category one hospitals and the category two hospitals are: That the category one hospitals better restrained increases in expenses by maintaining higher rates of increase in productivity. That apparently higher expenses in category two hospitals are not real because expenses have been shifted into the Medicare PPS inpatient sector that were actually incurred in the non-Medicare sector. At this time, evidence is insufficient to determine which hypothesis is more valid.

Case mix by hospital category

Case-mix indexes are used in the industry to represent average case complexity in PPS. Some argue that rapidly increasing outputs per discharge and lower productivity rates in category two hospitals are the result of more complex cases, i.e., higher case-mix indexes, that require more goods and services and greater amounts of labor and non-labor resources. However, case-mix index changes in category two hospitals are the same as for the other two hospital categories (Table 12).
Table 12

Case-mix index changes and annual percent changes, by Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) profit status: PPS 2 (1985) and PPS 7 (1990)

Profit statusCase-mix index levelAverage annual percent change

PPS 7PPS 2
All hospitals1.3331.1782.5
Category 111.3551.1992.5
Category 221.3341.1782.5
Category 331.2241.0862.4

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net profits in PPS 2 and PPS 7.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net profits in PPS 2 and net losses in PPS 7.

Hospitals with Medicare PPS net losses in PPS 2 and PPS 7.

NOTE: For definition of PPS 2 and PPS 7, see “Introduction.”

SOURCE: Health Care Financing Administration: Office of the Actuary.

Data sources and limitations

About 5,100 hospitals were continuously under PPS during the study period PPS 2 through PPS 7. Total facility and/or Medicare revenue and expense data for one or more cost reports for some of these hospitals were clearly erroneous (resulting in profit or loss rates that exceeded 100 percent in some cases). After eliminating hospitals that clearly reported erroneous data, 4,653 hospitals were accepted. Data shown for Medicare outpatient activity includes only that portion of outpatient care that is currently paid on a reasonable-cost basis and excludes aspects of Medicare outpatient care that is paid on a fee schedule. These fee-schedule revenues and expenses were not included in the Medicare sections of the Medicare cost reports and thus could not be captured. Such fee-schedule amounts, therefore, are erroneously included in the non-Medicare categories, along with other minor Medicare amounts for hospital-based skilled nursing and home health agency care. It is estimated that outpatient fee-schedule payments comprised about 10 to 15 percent of the amounts shown for outpatient reasonable costs in recent years. Data for Medicare-related managed-care revenues and expenses are not identified in Medicare cost reports and, therefore, are implicitly part of the non-Medicare sector. Data for Medicare-related inpatient revenues and expenses are implicitly a part of the non-Medicare sector where Medicare has no liability because employer-sponsored private health insurance paid the entire amount due for an employed Medicare enrollee who was dually entitled to Medicare hospital insurance and private health insurance. Data from the Medicare cost report file were linked with the AHA Annual Survey files for the study period PPS 2 through PPS 7 to obtain data on average payroll costs, benefits, and numbers of FTEs by hospital. A 96-percent crosswalk between the two data sets provided sufficient information to reasonably estimate the compensation and employment history of the subsets of hospitals examined. Annual files of Medicare discharge bills provide information on case weights under the PPS DRG system by individual hospital. These annual files, called “case-mix index files,” were merged with the Medicare cost reports to provide trends in case-mix indexes by categories of hospitals. Data on constant dollar values of real outputs provided by categories of hospitals were based on procedures as described by Fisher (1992). For estimates of the constant dollar values, percent changes in gross revenues per hospital for the total facilities sector, the Medicare PPS inpatient sector, and the non-Medicare sector by Federal fiscal year were deflated by percent changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) component for hospital and related services. Gross Medicare outpatient revenues per hospital were deflated by the CPI component (hospital and related services) excluding the effects of hospital room index changes. Because room-related gross revenues are available from Medicare cost reports for the total facility sector, but not for the Medicare inpatient sector, a ratio of total Medicare inpatient gross revenues to Medicare inpatient ancillary gross revenues for each hospital for each Federal fiscal year was obtained from individual PPS discharge bills on annual HCFA Medicare provider analysis and review (MEDPAR) files. This ratio was linked to each hospital's cost report file in this study with the corresponding PPS year. The ratio of room-related gross revenues to inpatient ancillary gross revenues from the MEDPAR files by the inpatient ancillary gross revenues in the cost reports thus provided an estimate of room-related Medicare gross revenues consistent with Medicare cost reports. Gross revenues for the non-Medicare sector were obtained by subtracting the Medicare PPS inpatient data and the Medicare outpatient data from the total facility data. Therefore, all average hospital list prices (i.e., prices for individual goods and services before any discounts are applied) by category of hospital and by category of facility within hospitals changed at the same rate as the relevant portion of the CPI hospital index. The values for determinants of increases (Table 7) can be evaluated from one's assessment of the robustness of the data used to establish each component of the accounting identity incorporated. If the annual rates of increase in total expenses and in the hospital input price index are relatively robust, then relative changes in real resource inputs are robust because real inputs are defined as total expenses divided by the hospital input price index. The expense accounting identity is defined as follows: can then be restated as the input accounting identity Because measurements of inputs are relatively robust, the validity of the findings about changes in real outputs and productivity rates thus depend on the validity of the method to derive real outputs. The validity of the method to derive real outputs, in turn, depends on the validity of the assumption that the CPI Hospital and Related Index is a list price measurement rather than a transaction price measurement. If the CPI Hospital and Related Index is not an adequate measure of hospital list prices, then the expense accounting identity may still be useful because the identity imposes constraints on what rates of change in hospital outputs and productivity rates can be reasonably considered (i.e., for given rates of change in expenses and input price indexes, values for changes in hospital outputs and productivity rates are constrained). Another implication of the assumption that the CPI Hospital and Related Index represents hospital list prices is that hospital output transaction prices are growing more slowly than hospital output list prices. One measure of the difference in the rate of change in list prices relative to transaction prices in the hospital sector is the rate of change in the ratio of gross patient revenues to net patient revenues obtained from Medicare cost reports and the AHA Annual Survey. This relationship has been quantified (Fisher, 1992). Capital-related expenses and direct medical education expenses represent unreduced amounts allocated to Medicare by the usual cost allocation procedures. Reduced amounts for capital-related and direct medical education pass-through amounts are shown in Table 10. Capital-related expense data are obtained from currently available files of Medicare Cost Reports submitted by hospitals to HCFA. A substantial portion of these files contain unaudited Medicare cost reports because audited reports are not currently available or will be submitted at a later date. Studies by HCFA indicate that capital-related expenses tend to be overreported on unaudited reports and that audited reports result in lower capital-related costs (Federal Register, 1991). To the extent that capital-related costs are overreported, Medicare inpatient PPS net profits of hospitals are understated and non-Medicare sector net profits are overstated.
  2 in total

1.  Profits, community role, and hospital closure: an urban and rural analysis.

Authors:  D Williams; J Hadley; J Pettengill
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Trends in total hospital financial performance under the prospective payment system.

Authors:  C R Fisher
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1992
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Are PPS payments adequate? Issues for updating and assessing rates.

Authors:  S H Sheingold; E Richter
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1992
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.