Literature DB >> 10121958

Characterization of errors detected during central order review.

L Ho1, G R Brown, B Millin.   

Abstract

Characterization of prescribing errors detected by dispensary pharmacists in a tertiary-care teaching hospital is described. During the 25 week study period, 1330 prescribing errors were identified from a total of 237,798 medication orders processed by the pharmacy, representing a rate of 5.6 errors per 1000 orders. Resident physicians wrote more errant medication orders than any other physician class. Errors most often occurred on the general medicine teaching wards. The most common drug classes implicated were non-formulary medications and antibiotics. Approximately 11% of errors were defined as potentially fatal or severe (Type A) errors, 7% were potentially serious (Type B), 21% were potentially significant (Type C) and 61% were problem orders (Type D) based on a classification system of severity. The most common error types were inappropriate dosing of antibiotics and the prescribing of medications for patients who had a potential conflicting allergy history. The acceptance of pharmacists' suggestions was 67%. The study identified three major areas where future educational and corrective measures could be aimed: adherence to the formulary, antibiotic prescribing and allergy validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10121958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0008-4123


  7 in total

1.  Hospital prescribing errors: epidemiological assessment of predictors.

Authors:  R Fijn; P M L A Van den Bemt; M Chow; C J De Blaey; L T W De Jong-Van den Berg; J R B J Brouwers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Tools for Assessing Potential Significance of Pharmacist Interventions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thi-Ha Vo; Bruno Charpiat; Claire Catoire; Michel Juste; Renaud Roubille; François-Xavier Rose; Sébastien Chanoine; Jean-Luc Bosson; Ornella Conort; Benoît Allenet; Pierrick Bedouch
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Prescribing errors in hospital practice.

Authors:  Mary P Tully
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  What is the scale of prescribing errors committed by junior doctors? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Ross; Christine Bond; Helen Rothnie; Sian Thomas; Mary Joan Macleod
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Penny J Lewis; Tim Dornan; David Taylor; Mary P Tully; Val Wass; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  The causes of and factors associated with prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mary P Tully; Darren M Ashcroft; Tim Dornan; Penny J Lewis; David Taylor; Val Wass
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Measuring the severity of prescribing errors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sara Garfield; Matthew Reynolds; Liesbeth Dermont; Bryony Dean Franklin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.606

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.