Literature DB >> 10119671

Due process in ethics committee case review.

S M Wolf1.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 10119671     DOI： 10.1007/bf00058011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN： 0956-2737


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  Wests Supreme Court Report       Date:  1990-06-25

2.  Ethics committees and due process: nesting rights in a community of caring.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  MD Law Rev       Date:  1991

3.  Optimum care for hopelessly ill patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Ethics committees in the courts.

Authors:  S M Wolf
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Conflict between doctor and patient.

Authors:  S M Wolf
Journal:  Law Med Health Care       Date:  1988 Fall-Winter

6.  Hospital ethics committees. Administrative aspects.

Authors:  N Fost; R E Cranford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  What and who are clinical ethics committees for?

Authors:  Sheila A M McLean
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  CLINICAL ETHICS COMMITTEES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: TOWARDS EVALUATION.

Authors:  Laura Williamson; Sheila McLean; Judith Connell
Journal:  Med Law Int       Date:  2007-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.