Literature DB >> 10114069

Comparing CPR during ambulance transport. Manual vs. mechanical methods.

E R Stapleton1.   

Abstract

Performing CPR during transport is easier said than done and may, in fact, pose significant danger to prehospital providers. Factors such as road conditions, speed and vehicle type, as well as specific CPR methods, are compared in this comprehensive study.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1991        PMID： 10114069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JEMS        ISSN： 0197-2510


  6 in total

1.  Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Peter L Wang; Steven C Brooks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-20

2.  New Developments in Cardiac Arrest Management.

Authors:  Matthias L Riess
Journal:  Adv Anesth       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Mechanical CPR devices compared to manual CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ambulance transport: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Kevin E Mackey; Zhong Cheng Zhang; Hideharu Tanaka; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Robert Swor; Sang Do Shin
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  The Use of Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation May Be Associated With Improved Outcomes Over Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Inhospital Cardiac Arrests.

Authors:  Conor P Crowley; Emily S Wan; Justin D Salciccioli; Edy Kim
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-11-16

5.  Adult Basic Life Support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Theresa M Olasveengen; Mary E Mancini; Gavin D Perkins; Suzanne Avis; Steven Brooks; Maaret Castrén; Sung Phil Chung; Julie Considine; Keith Couper; Raffo Escalante; Tetsuo Hatanaka; Kevin K C Hung; Peter Kudenchuk; Swee Han Lim; Chika Nishiyama; Giuseppe Ristagno; Federico Semeraro; Christopher M Smith; Michael A Smyth; Christian Vaillancourt; Jerry P Nolan; Mary Fran Hazinski; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  LUCAS Versus Manual Chest Compression During Ambulance Transport: A Hemodynamic Study in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Aurora Magliocca; Davide Olivari; Daria De Giorgio; Davide Zani; Martina Manfredi; Antonio Boccardo; Alberto Cucino; Giulia Sala; Giovanni Babini; Laura Ruggeri; Deborah Novelli; Markus B Skrifvars; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; Davide Pravettoni; Lidia Staszewsky; Roberto Latini; Angelo Belloli; Giuseppe Ristagno
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.501
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.