Literature DB >> 10113351

Appropriateness of acute medical care for the elderly: an analysis of the literature.

R H Brook1, C J Kamberg, A Mayer-Oakes, M H Beers, K Raube, A Steiner.   

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, an explosion in health care expenditures has occurred. Prior to 1960, health care accounted for 4.4% of the U.S. Gross National Product; today it is 11%. Before rational solutions to controlling this rise can be proposed, we must determine whether the care that we are currently paying for is appropriate to the needs of the elderly. This paper analyzes the literature regarding appropriateness of acute care provided to the elderly. We identified 17 articles that explicitly cited appropriate or inappropriate care (including under-, over- and misuse) provided in hospital and ambulatory settings and for procedures, and 19 articles that presented data on the appropriateness of medication use in the elderly. Virtually every study included in this review found at least double-digit levels of inappropriate care. Perhaps as much as one-fifth to one-quarter of acute hospital services or procedures were felt to be used for equivocal or inappropriate reasons, and two-fifths to one-half of the medications studied were overused in outpatients. The few studies that examined underuse or misuse of services also documented the existence of these phenomena. This was especially true for the ambulatory care of chronic physical and mental conditions and concerned the use of low-cost technologies (visits, preventive services, some medications). Thus, we conclude that there appears to be a substantial problem in the matching of acute services to the needs of elderly patients. This mismatch occurs both in terms of overuse and underuse, at least for areas where research has been conducted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 10113351     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90037-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

1.  The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: impacts and lessons from the first decade.

Authors:  D Stryer; S Tunis; H Hubbard; C Clancy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Jeffrey A Alexander; Stephen M Shortell; Laurence C Baker; Mark Becker; Jeffrey J Geppert
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The paradox of primary care.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Robert L Ferrer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Indicators of the appropriateness of long-term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom: consensus development, face and content validity, feasibility, and reliability.

Authors:  J A Cantrill; B Sibbald; S Buetow
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-09

5.  Application of Quality Assurance Strategies in Diagnostics and Clinical Support Services in Iranian Hospitals.

Authors:  Asgar Aghaei Hashjin; Dionne Kringos; Hamid Ravaghi; Jila Manoochehri; Hassan Abolghasem Gorji; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-05-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.