Literature DB >> 10112340

Uses of an empirically derived client typology based on level of functioning: twelve years of the CCAR.

R H Ellis1, J H Wackwitz, M Foster.   

Abstract

The Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR) is a problem checklist and level of functioning rating instrument used to describe admission to a public mental health system. A brief, non-technical summary of recent research and administrative applications involving this instrument is presented. A stable factor structure, generalizable to several diverse client populations, is reported. Scaling procedures for measuring these procedures and a client typology based on this scaling are described. The client typology is differentially related to the types of services received and the costs of treatment episodes. The typology is also used to understand differences in case mixes and lengths of stay at two state hospitals.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 10112340     DOI: 10.1007/bf02518603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health Adm        ISSN: 0092-8623


  6 in total

1.  Superfactors P, E And N In A Comprehensive Factor Space.

Authors:  H J Eysenck
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1978-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  On Obtaining the Best Estimates of Factor Scores Within An Ideal Simple Structure.

Authors:  J Wackwitz; J Horn
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1971-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  The factor structure of the Colorado Level of Functioning Measure.

Authors:  G J Stahler
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1987-11

4.  Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: the Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR).

Authors:  R H Ellis; N Z Wilson; F M Foster
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1984

5.  Treatment outcomes in a day treatment program.

Authors:  J Reihman; K Wolford; W Knapp; J MacCallum; N Murray
Journal:  Int J Partial Hosp       Date:  1983-03

6.  Do therapists bias their ratings of patient functioning under peer review?

Authors:  G J Stahler; H Rappaport
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1986
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Needs-based planning: evaluation of a level-of-care planning model.

Authors:  J Durbin; J Cochrane; P Goering; D Macfarlane
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Service needs, receipt, and outcomes for types of clients with serious and persistent mental illness.

Authors:  D A Bartsch; D L Shern; A S Coen; N Z Wilson
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1995

3.  Current evaluation and future needs of a mental health data linkage system in a remote region: a Canadian experience.

Authors:  Larry Squire; Michel Bédard; Leslie Hegge; Vicki Polischuk
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Measures of impairment for children and adolescents.

Authors:  K Hodges; J Gust
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1995

5.  The Hoosier Assurance Plan Instrument for Adults (HAPI-A): the psychometric properties of a level of functioning assessment instrument designed for use in a state managed care mental health program.

Authors:  John McGrew; Frederick L Newman; Richard N DeLiberty
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2007-07-10

6.  System-wide implementation of ACT in Ontario: an ongoing improvement effort.

Authors:  Lindsey George; Janet Durbin; Christopher J Koegl
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  Record linkage in a regional mental health planning study: accuracy of unique identifiers, reliability of sociodemographics, and estimating identification error.

Authors:  A J Dalrymple; L S Lahti; L J Hutchinson; J J O'Doherty
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1994
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.