Literature DB >> 10111356

Physician recertification and outcomes assessment.

B K Kremer1.   

Abstract

Physician recertification poses a unique challenge to member boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) charged with the responsibility of credentialing physicians. The key issue that emerges in recertification programs is how to evaluate performance in practice. Although some test of knowledge may be appropriate, an evaluation of clinical performance has become essential in recertification programs. To meet this challenge, ABMS boards have adopted methods to evaluate performance in practice. However, regardless of the methods chosen, criteria are needed to serve as standards. This article considers the application of outcomes assessment in the definition of standards for recertification. When direct outcome assessment may not be possible, outcome-validated process measures may provide a suitable alternative.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 10111356     DOI: 10.1177/016327879101400204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  3 in total

Review 1.  Recertification in the United States.

Authors:  J J Norcini
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

Review 2.  Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention.

Authors:  John J Connors; David Sacks; Anthony J Furlan; Warren R Selman; Eric J Russell; Philip E Stieg; Mark N Hadley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  No to mandatory continuing medical education, yes to mandatory practice auditing and professional educational development.

Authors:  N Donen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-04-21       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.