Literature DB >> 10110455

Full-text and bibliographic database searching in the health sciences: an exploratory study comparing CCML and MEDLINE.

K E Gallagher1, L A Hulbert, C P Sullivan.   

Abstract

An exploratory study to investigate perceived differences between searching full-text databases and bibliographic databases was undertaken. BRS's full-text database, Comprehensive Core Medical Library (CCML), and BRS's current MEDLINE file (MESH) were compared. Identical literature search topics were run in the two databases and the results evaluated regarding currency of search results, success in answering specific questions, uniqueness of information retrieved, and relevancy of retrieval. Additionally, connect time and costs were noted to aid in determining the feasibility of offering full-text database searching as a service for which the authors' institution would charge.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 10110455     DOI: 10.1300/j115v09n04_02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q        ISSN: 0276-3869


  2 in total

1.  EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Ralph A Gillies; Kathy Davies
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Jean-François Gehanno; Laetitia Rollin; Stefan Darmoni
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.