| Literature DB >> 10110411 |
Abstract
In 1987-88, the first of two surveys conducted questioned the administrator's viewpoint on choice of reporting authority for plant operations and clinical engineering departments as well as the job satisfaction and prestige associated with these responsibilities. The second tested the response of clinical engineers on similar issues as well as the effect of certain organizational factors on their degree of functional involvement in the equipment-management process. In the first survey, two-thirds of the administrators chose a structure that, as shown in the second survey, leads to a higher degree of involvement and satisfaction for clinical engineers. Other organizational factors that have an effect are: the type of hospital (teaching and nonteaching), the presence of qualified university-degree engineers, and ensuring that the clinical engineering role within the health care institution is recognized and supported. Teaching hospitals are found to provide a better climate than nonteaching ones for the support of the research and education activities. Clinical engineering departments, whose role has been recognized and supported by their institution, are more substantially involved in all aspects of the equipment-management process than those who are still seeking this recognition. Finally, departments where university-degree engineers have been hired again show more involvement and commitment to the quality and efficiency of their operation.Mesh:
Year: 1991 PMID: 10110411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hosp Health Serv Adm ISSN: 8750-3735