Literature DB >> 10103132

Contralateral trigeminal nerve lesion reduces polyneuronal muscle innervation after facial nerve repair in rats.

D N Angelov1, E Skouras, O Guntinas-Lichius, M Streppel, A Popratiloff, M Walther, J Klein, E Stennert, W F Neiss.   

Abstract

Functional recovery after facial nerve surgery is poor. Axotomized motoneurons (hyperexcitable upon intracellular current injections, but unable to discharge upon afferent stimulation) outgrow supernumerary branches which are misrouted towards improper muscles. We hypothesized that alterations in the trigeminal input to axotomized electrophysiologically silent facial motoneurons might improve specificity of reinnervation. To test this we compared, in the rat, behavioural, electrophysiological, and morphological parameters after transection and suture of the buccal facial nerve (buccal-buccal anastomosis, BBA) with those after BBA plus excision of the ipsi- or contralateral infraorbital nerve (ION). After BBA, the mystacial vibrissae dropped and remained motionless until 18-21 days post operation (days PO). After BBA plus ipsilateral ION excision, there was no recovery of vibrissae whisking at all. Following BBA plus contralateral ION excision, full restoration of whisking occurred at 7-10 days PO. Electromyography of whiskerpad muscles showed normal waveform and amplitude was also most rapidly restored after BBA plus contralateral ION excision. Neuron counts after retrograde tracing showed that the intact buccal nerve contained axons of the superior (91%) and inferior (9%) buccolabial nerves. After BBA, the superior nerve comprised 56%, the inferior 21%, and 23% of the motoneurons projected within both nerves. After BBA plus ipsilateral ION excision, misdirection worsened and values changed to 48, 39 and 13%, respectively. After BBA plus contralateral ION excision, portions improved to 69, 23 and 8%. We conclude that, by reducing the redundant axon branching, lesion of contralateral ION provides the best conditions for recovery of vibrissae rhythmical whisking after reconstructive surgery on the facial nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10103132     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00545.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  7 in total

1.  Transplantation of olfactory mucosa minimizes axonal branching and promotes the recovery of vibrissae motor performance after facial nerve repair in rats.

Authors:  Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Konstantin Wewetzer; Toma L Tomov; Natalie Azzolin; Shohreh Kazemi; Michael Streppel; Wolfrum F Neiss; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  [Regeneration of the facial nerve in comparison to other peripheral nerves : from bench to bedside].

Authors:  A Irintchev; D N Angelov; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Experimental studies for the improvement of facial nerve regeneration].

Authors:  O Guntinas-Lichius; D N Angelov
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Non-invasive stimulation of the vibrissal pad improves recovery of whisking function after simultaneous lesion of the facial and infraorbital nerves in rats.

Authors:  H Bendella; S P Pavlov; M Grosheva; A Irintchev; S K Angelova; D Merkel; N Sinis; K Kaidoglou; E Skouras; S A Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of venous ensheathment on facial nerve repair in the rat.

Authors:  Pei Chen; Christopher J Knox; Linli Yao; Chunli Li; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Treatment With Nimodipine or FK506 After Facial Nerve Repair Neither Improves Accuracy of Reinnervation Nor Recovery of Mimetic Function in Rats.

Authors:  Mohammed Barham; Michael Streppel; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Nicole Fulgham-Scott; Johannes Vogt; Wolfram F Neiss
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  A system for delivering mechanical stimulation and robot-assisted therapy to the rat whisker pad during facial nerve regeneration.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Christopher J Knox; Juan S Malo; James B Kobler; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.802

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.