Literature DB >> 10103118

Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 1: behavioural study.

R Vogels1.   

Abstract

In order to study how visual categories are coded by the activities of single neurons, it is necessary to first demonstrate that the animal subjects can categorize the visual stimuli employed in the single-unit recordings. Thus, rhesus monkeys were trained in a visual categorization task designed to minimize rote learning of individual exemplars and to allow testing of transfer from old to novel exemplars of the category. The stimuli were presented during controlled fixation. The monkeys learned to distinguish complex colour images of trees from other objects and generalized from old to novel exemplars. An extensive series of tests with probe stimuli showed that simple form, colour and texture features had insufficient stimulus control to account for the categorization performance. Scrambling the images impaired categorization performance, suggesting that the configuration of stimulus components controlled the categorization. The animals also learned a fish/non-fish categorization, but more slowly than a tree/non-tree categorization. These results indicate that rhesus monkeys can learn to categorize socially neutral, complex, natural visual images and suggest that this categorization is based on a combination of low-level features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10103118     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00530.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  24 in total

Review 1.  The prefrontal cortex: categories, concepts and cognition.

Authors:  Earl K Miller; David J Freedman; Jonathan D Wallis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Nonverbal Working Memory for Novel Images in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Visual categorization of natural movies by rats.

Authors:  Kasper Vinken; Ben Vermaercke; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Contrasting the edge- and surface-based theories of object recognition: behavioral evidence from macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Carole Parron; David Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

5.  Representation of multiple, independent categories in the primate prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jason A Cromer; Jefferson E Roy; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Evolutionary Constraints on Human Object Perception.

Authors:  Sarah E Koopman; Bradford Z Mahon; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-29

7.  Humans and monkeys share visual representations.

Authors:  Denis Fize; Maxime Cauchoix; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effects of stimulus duration and choice delay on visual categorization in pigeons.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2009-05-01

9.  Categorization in the monkey hippocampus: a possible mechanism for encoding information into memory.

Authors:  Robert E Hampson; Tim P Pons; Terrence R Stanford; Sam A Deadwyler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Contributions of the Monkey Inferior Temporal Areas TE and TEO to Visual Categorization.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Setogawa; Mark A G Eldridge; Grace P Fomani; Richard C Saunders; Barry J Richmond
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.