Literature DB >> 10102459

Clinical prediction of deep vein thrombosis in patients with leg symptoms.

S R Kahn1, L Joseph, L Abenhaim, J R Leclerc.   

Abstract

Symptoms and clinical signs individually are inaccurate for the diagnosis of DVT. However, when assessing patients with leg symptoms, clinicians have access to additional information, such as whether or not DVT risk factors are present that could improve the accuracy of clinical judgment. The purpose of this study was to identify which clinical variables best predict DVT, and to use these variables to create a clinical prediction index for DVT. We studied 271 university hospital patients with a first episode of symptomatic, clinically suspected DVT. The prevalence of DVT was 27%, of which 71% were proximal. At baseline, information was collected on demographic features, comorbidity, and symptoms and signs. A Bayesian model selection strategy was used to estimate the logistic regression model that best predicted DVT. Male sex [OR = 2.8 (1.5, 5.1)], orthopedic surgery [OR = 5.4 (2.2, 13.6)], warmth [OR = 2.1 (1.2, 3.9)] and superficial venous dilation on exam [OR = 2.9 (1.4, 5.7)] were independent predictors of DVT. Using the model, a clinical prediction index that categorized patients into different levels of DVT risk was created, and was useful in a theoretical strategy aimed to limit the need for contrast venography in patients with suspected DVT, such that 96% of study patients could have avoided contrast venography. This index should be evaluated prospectively in other patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10102459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  6 in total

Review 1.  Suspected deep vein thrombosis: a management algorithm for the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  S Nawaz; P Chan; S Ireland
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-11

2.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part I. The Consensus for Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Kang-Ling Wang; Pao-Hsien Chu; Cheng-Han Lee; Pei-Ying Pai; Pao-Yen Lin; Kou-Gi Shyu; Wei-Tien Chang; Kuan-Ming Chiu; Chien-Lung Huang; Chung-Yi Lee; Yen-Hung Lin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Hsueh-Wei Yen; Wei-Hsian Yin; Hung-I Yeh; Chern-En Chiang; Shing-Jong Lin; San-Jou Yeh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 4.  Gender differences of venous thromboembolism risk after total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Lu; Zhen-Yu Zhou; Ya-Ke Liu; Hong-Lin Chen; Hui-Lin Yang; Fan Liu
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Risk of recurrence after venous thromboembolism in men and women: patient level meta-analysis.

Authors:  James Douketis; Alberto Tosetto; Maura Marcucci; Trevor Baglin; Benilde Cosmi; Mary Cushman; Paul Kyrle; Daniela Poli; R Campbell Tait; Alfonso Iorio
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-24

6.  Physical examination checklist for medical students: can less be more?

Authors:  Mohammed Elhassan
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-06-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.