Literature DB >> 10101030

Flavone antagonists bind competitively with 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor but inhibit nuclear uptake and transformation.

E C Henry1, A S Kende, G Rucci, M J Totleben, J J Willey, S D Dertinger, R S Pollenz, J P Jones, T A Gasiewicz.   

Abstract

Previous analyses suggested that potent aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) antagonists were planar, with a lateral electron-rich center. To further define structural requirements and mechanism for antagonism, ten additional flavone derivatives were synthesized. Based on their ability to 1) compete with 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) for binding to the AhR; 2) inhibit TCDD-elicited binding of AhR to dioxin-responsive elements (DRE) in vitro; and 3) inhibit TCDD-induced transcription of DRE-dependent luciferase in stably transfected hepatoma cells, the most potent flavones contained a 3'-methoxy group and a 4'-substituent having one or more terminal atoms of high electron density (-N3, -NO2, or -NCS). Furthermore, these had low agonist activity as assessed by their inability to elicit AhR. DRE binding or to induce luciferase. Compounds containing bulkier 3' or 4'-substituents, or a 3'-OH group were less potent antagonists, and some were partial agonists. In rat liver cytosol, 3'-methoxy-4'-azido- and 3'-methoxy-4'-nitroflavones bound competitively (with TCDD) to the AhR, indicating that they bind to the TCDD-binding site. When hepatoma cells were exposed to these flavones, AhR complexes were primarily immunoprecipitable from the cytosol and contained 90 kDa heat shock protein. In contrast, AhR in TCDD-treated cells was primarily immunoprecipitated from nuclear extracts and was associated with Arnt but not 90 kDa heat shock protein. Immunocytofluorescence analysis in intact cells further indicated that the potent antagonist inhibited nuclear uptake of AhR and blocked TCDD-dependent down-regulation of AhR. Together, these data indicate that the most potent antagonists bind the AhR with high affinity but cannot initiate receptor transformation and nuclear localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10101030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  22 in total

1.  Novel 2-amino-isoflavones exhibit aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist or antagonist activity in a species/cell-specific context.

Authors:  Richard J Wall; Guochun He; Michael S Denison; Cenzo Congiu; Valentina Onnis; Alwyn Fernandes; David R Bell; Martin Rose; J Craig Rowlands; Gianfranco Balboni; Ian R Mellor
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Mechanism-based common reactivity pattern (COREPA) modelling of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding affinity.

Authors:  P I Petkov; J C Rowlands; R Budinsky; B Zhao; M S Denison; O Mekenyan
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: Connecting Immunity to the Microenvironment.

Authors:  Rahul Shinde; Tracy L McGaha
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 16.687

4.  Identification of small molecules that support human leukemia stem cell activity ex vivo.

Authors:  Caroline Pabst; Jana Krosl; Iman Fares; Geneviève Boucher; Réjean Ruel; Anne Marinier; Sébastien Lemieux; Josée Hébert; Guy Sauvageau
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Andrew D Patterson; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  A ligand for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor isolated from lung.

Authors:  Jiasheng Song; Margaret Clagett-Dame; Richard E Peterson; Mark E Hahn; William M Westler; Rafal R Sicinski; Hector F DeLuca
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An aryl hydrocarbon receptor conformation acts as the functional core of nuclear dioxin signaling.

Authors:  S Kronenberg; C Esser; C Carlberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Suppression of cytokine-mediated complement factor gene expression through selective activation of the Ah receptor with 3',4'-dimethoxy-α-naphthoflavone.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Colin A Flaveny; Christopher R Chiaro; Arun K Sharma; Rachel S Tanos; Jennifer C Schroeder; Shantu G Amin; William H Bisson; Siva K Kolluri; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Molecular determinants of species-specific agonist and antagonist activity of a substituted flavone towards the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  E C Henry; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.013

10.  Agonist and chemopreventative ligands induce differential transcriptional cofactor recruitment by aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Eli V Hestermann; Myles Brown
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.