Literature DB >> 10100178

Influence of continuous combined estradiol-norethisterone acetate preparations on insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal nondiabetic women.

R Kimmerle1, L Heinemann, T Heise, R Bender, C Weyer, S Hirschberger, M Berger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Estrogen-progestogen replacement therapy (HRT) may be associated with deterioration of insulin sensitivity in comparison to estrogens alone, which tend to improve insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. Insulin sensitivity with the use of continuous combined 17-beta estradiol/norethisterone acetate (E2/NETA) preparations has not been examined before in postmenopausal women.
DESIGN: In a double-blind randomized parallel study, we evaluated the effect of 2 mg E2/1 mg NETA (high dose E2/NETA), 1 mg E2/0.5 mg NETA (low dose E2/NETA), or placebo (P) on the insulin sensitivity index (SI) in three groups (18 women/group) of postmenopausal nondiabetic women (follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] > 40 mIU/mL, mean +/- SD) aged 56 +/- 3 years, BMI 25 +/- 4 kg/m2, cholesterol 233 +/- 42 mg/dL, and triglycerides 87 +/- 36 mg/dL. Insulin sensitivity was measured by means of a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp (insulin infusion rate, 0.25 and 1.0 mU/kg/min for 120 min each) at baseline and after 3 months of daily administration of high dose E2/NETA, low dose E2/NETA, or P. Analysis was performed assuming equivalence of start-end changes of insulin sensitivity among treatment groups (Anderson-Hauck test).
RESULTS: SI was 7.7 +/- 2.9, 7.5 +/- 3.4, 6.8 +/- 2.2 at baseline and 6.3 +/- 3.0, 7.9 +/- 2.5, 7.1 +/- 3.1 mL/min/m2 per mu U/mL 3 months after the administration of high dose E2/NETA, low dose E2/NETA, and P, respectively. The low dose E2/NETA group had start-to-end changes of SI which were equivalent to the P group (0.4 [95% confidence interval [CI] -0.8; 1.7] vs. 0.4 [-0.3; 1.0]) (p = 0.02). For the high dose E2/NETA group, equivalence could not be shown with either the P (p = 0.89) or with the low dose E2/NETA group (p = 0.90). SI within the high dose E2/NETA group decreased by -1.5 (95% CI -2.7; -0.2) mL/min/m2 per mu U/mL. HbAlc decreased from 5.3 +/- 0.3 to 5.1 +/- 0.3% within the high dose E2/NETA group (p < 0.03) and remained unchanged within the low dose E2/NETA and P group. Fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, and C-peptide, as well as triglycerides and BMI were comparable among the groups at baseline and after 3 months. Total cholesterol decreased by 12% and 8% in women treated with high dose and low dose E2/NETA (p < 0.02), respectively, and remained unchanged within the P group.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that 3 months use of a low dose continuous E2/NETA preparation does not change insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. At high dose of E2/NETA, a modest decrease seems possible. The effects of E2/NETA on other parameters of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism are neutral or favorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10100178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  11 in total

1.  Intravenous estrogens increase insulin clearance and action in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R E Van Pelt; W S Gozansky; R S Schwartz; W M Kohrt
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  Acute modulation of adipose tissue lipolysis by intravenous estrogens.

Authors:  Rachael E Van Pelt; Wendolyn S Gozansky; Robert C Hickner; Robert S Schwartz; Wendy M Kohrt
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  How to Assess the Quality of Glucose Clamps? Evaluation of Clamps Performed With ClampArt, a Novel Automated Clamp Device.

Authors:  Carsten Benesch; Tim Heise; Oliver Klein; Lutz Heinemann; Sabine Arnolds
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-07

Review 4.  Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Type 2 Diabetes Prevention: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Franck Mauvais-Jarvis; JoAnn E Manson; John C Stevenson; Vivian A Fonseca
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Insulin resistance with hormone replacement therapy: associations with markers of inflammation and adiposity.

Authors:  Brian C Cooper; Natalie Z Burger; Michael J Toth; Mary Cushman; Cynthia K Sites
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Ovarian suppression with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist does not alter insulin-stimulated glucose disposal.

Authors:  Brian C Cooper; Cynthia K Sites; Peter R Casson; Michael J Toth
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Effect of oestrogen plus progestin on the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trial.

Authors:  K L Margolis; D E Bonds; R J Rodabough; L Tinker; L S Phillips; C Allen; T Bassford; G Burke; J Torrens; B V Howard
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Individual effect of E2 and dydrogesterone on insulin sensitivity in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  L Soranna; F Cucinelli; C Perri; G Muzj; M Giuliani; P Villa; A Lanzone
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  Menopausal hormone therapy in women with medical conditions.

Authors:  Ekta Kapoor; Juliana M Kling; Angie S Lobo; Stephanie S Faubion
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.690

10.  Estrogen or raloxifene during postmenopausal weight loss: adiposity and cardiometabolic outcomes.

Authors:  R E Van Pelt; W S Gozansky; P Wolfe; J M Kittelson; C M Jankowski; R S Schwartz; W M Kohrt
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.