Literature DB >> 10100087

The ethics of using placebo in hypertension clinical trials.

M A Weber.   

Abstract

USE OF PLACEBO CONTROLS: Placebo controls can enhance the value of two types of hypertension trials: measurement of the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of antihypertensive treatment and determination of whether therapeutic interventions can affect clinical endpoints. However, the possibility of adverse outcomes in hypertensive patients allocated to placebo therapy raises ethical concerns. EFFICACY STUDIES: Placebo controls in efficacy studies are particularly helpful in thoroughly quantifying the effect of treatment. The hazard to patients can be minimized by exposing them to placebo for the least possible amount of time and, assuming that blood pressure is itself the primary variable, reducing the probability of cardiovascular events by excluding subjects with severe hypertension or major concomitant risk factors. ENDPOINT STUDIES: Endpoint studies present a more difficult challenge, for they are designed in anticipation of cardiovascular events and patients at high risk are often enrolled in order to more rapidly achieve the required number of endpoints for statistical analysis. In such circumstances, positive therapeutic controls, despite the complexities of analysis, must be preferred to placebo. EARLY-STAGE HYPERTENSION: Important questions regarding the management of early-stage hypertension remain, and despite official treatment guidelines recommendations, currently based chiefly on extrapolation and judgement, many physicians routinely withhold therapy in mild hypertension, even when other risk factors are present. With appropriate safeguards, placebo-controlled trials may be necessary to examine potential benefits of therapy in such patients. Indeed, resolving therapeutic uncertainty and creating well founded recommendations for the future management of the many patients with milder forms of hypertension can make placebo controls both ethical and appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10100087     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199917010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  5 in total

1.  The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future.

Authors:  Robert V Carlson; Kenneth M Boyd; David J Webb
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Can we justify goal blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg in most hypertensives?

Authors:  Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Physicians' preferences for active-controlled versus placebo-controlled trials of new antihypertensive drugs.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Peter A Ubel; Jesse A Berlin; Raymond R Townsend; David A Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Clinical trials of antihypertensives: Nature of control and design.

Authors:  Bhaswat S Chakraborty
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.200

5.  Effect of Omacor on HRV parameters in patients with recent uncomplicated myocardial infarction - A randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: study design [ISRCTN75358739].

Authors:  Cornel Pater; Daniele Compagnone; Joachim Luszick; Cees-Nico Verboom
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2003-10-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.