Literature DB >> 10099751

The introduction of a woman-held record into a hospital antenatal clinic: the bring your own records study.

C S Homer1, G K Davis, L S Everitt.   

Abstract

We report the introduction of a woman-held record into an antenatal clinic in a NSW teaching hospital using a randomized controlled trial. In 1997, 150 women were randomized to either retaining their entire antenatal record through pregnancy (women-held group) or to holding a small, abbreviated card, as was standard practice (control group). A questionnaire was distributed to women to measure sense of control, involvement in care and levels of communication. Availability of records at antenatal visits was also measured. Women in both groups were satisfied with their allocated method of record keeping, however, those in the women-held group were significantly more likely to report feeling in 'control' during pregnancy. Women in the control group were more likely to feel anxious and helpless and less likely to have information on their records explained to them by their caregiver. The number of records available at each clinic was similar in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10099751     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03445.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  19 in total

1.  I am a good patient, believe it or not.

Authors:  Alejandro R Jadad; Carlos A Rizo; Murray W Enkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-14

2.  Interfaces for the Personal Pregnancy Health Records (PregHeR) system: facets in time.

Authors:  Songphan Choemprayong; Sanghee Oh; Laura Sheble
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Improving communication between health professionals and women in maternity care: a structured review.

Authors:  Rachel E Rowe; Jo Garcia; Alison J Macfarlane; Leslie L Davidson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy.

Authors:  Heather C Brown; Helen J Smith; Rintaro Mori; Hisashi Noma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-14

Review 5.  Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Traber Davis Giardina; Shailaja Menon; Danielle E Parrish; Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review.

Authors:  Stephen E Ross; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Self-management for people with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  F Saibil; E Lai; A Hayward; J Yip; C Gilbert
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care.

Authors:  Cecilia Pyper; Justin Amery; Marion Watson; Claire Crook
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Challenges to using an electronic personal health record by a low-income elderly population.

Authors:  Eung-Hun Kim; Anna Stolyar; William B Lober; Anne L Herbaugh; Sally E Shinstrom; Brenda K Zierler; Cheong B Soh; Yongmin Kim
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Facilitating better postnatal care with women-held documents in The Gambia: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Tiffany Gooden; Lotta Gustafsson; Fides Lu; Faith Rickard; Alice Sitch; Carole Cummins; Kebba Manneh; Amie Wilson; Christine MacArthur; Semira Manaseki-Holland
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.