Literature DB >> 10099742

A survey of parturients using epidural analgesia during labour. Considerations relevant to antenatal educators.

M J Paech1, L C Gurrin.   

Abstract

The use of epidural analgesia (EA) during labour is increasing in Australasia. This highlights the need for improved educational and resource materials, current factual information about EA, and identification of consumer attitudes towards EA. In this survey, 350 parturients who had recently used EA for labour pain relief in a single maternity unit were asked to complete a questionnaire about their expectations and experience. The response rate was 90%. Prepartum information was most commonly derived from hearsay and least commonly from medical health professionals, 56% of respondents wanted pain to be made tolerable and 34% wanted complete pain relief. Almost half considered unrestricted mobility and delivery without obstetric assistance important. A minority were concerned about possible effects of EA on the baby or labour outcome. Anticipated pain during epidural placement was significantly greater than that experienced. Satisfaction with EA was high, although 36% described unpleasant or annoying effects associated with EA. Parent educators and epidural service providers should be aided by knowledge of where parturients obtain information and of consumer views about EA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10099742     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03436.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  6 in total

1.  Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet.

Authors:  Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Natasha Nassar; Siranda Torvaldsen; Lyndal Trevena; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Do audio-guided decision aids improve outcomes? A randomized controlled trial of an audio-guided decision aid compared with a booklet decision aid for Australian women considering labour analgesia.

Authors:  Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Christine L Roberts; Natasha Nassar; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Factors Influencing the Preference of Regional Anaesthesia in the Obstetric Population: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Pelin Karaaslan; Coşkun Aydın; Tarık Aksu
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-05-29

4.  Survey of the Factors Associated with a Woman's Choice to Have an Epidural for Labor Analgesia.

Authors:  Jennifer Harkins; Brendan Carvalho; Amy Evers; Sachin Mehta; Edward T Riley
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-06-29

5.  Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for the management of pain in labour and childbirth [ISRCTN52287533].

Authors:  Christine L Roberts; Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Natasha Nassar; Lyndal Trevena; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Neuraxial analgesia: a review of its effects on the outcome and duration of labor.

Authors:  Hoon Jung; Kyung-Hwa Kwak
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-11-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.