Literature DB >> 10098431

Figo IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: an analysis of prognostic factors emphasizing the balance between external beam and intracavitary radiation therapy.

M D Logsdon1, P J Eifel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define patient, tumor, and treatment factors that influence the outcome of patients with FIGO Stage IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 1,096 patients treated with radiation therapy between 1960 and 1993 for FIGO Stage IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, 983 (90%) were treated with curative intent and 113 were treated only to achieve palliation of symptoms. Of 907 patients who completed the intended curative treatment, 641 (71%) were treated with a combination of external beam irradiation (EBRT) and intracavitary irradiation (ICRT) and 266 (29%) were treated with EBRT only. The median duration of treatment for these 907 patients was 51 days. Between 1966 and 1980, only 52% of patients who completed treatment with curative intent received ICRT, compared with 92% of patients treated during 1981-1993, an increase that reflects an evolution in the philosophy of treatment for advanced tumors. In general, the intensity of ICRT correlated inversely with the dose of EBRT to the,central pelvis. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 134 months.
RESULTS: For 983 patients treated with initial curative intent, disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly worse for those who were < 40 years old, had experienced more than a 10% weight loss, or had a hemoglobin level < 10 g/dl before or during radiation therapy. Tumor factors that correlated with a relatively poor DSS were bilateral pelvic wall involvement, clinical tumor diameter > or = 8 cm, hydronephrosis, lower vaginal involvement, and evidence of lymph node metastases on lymphangiogram (p < 0.01 in all cases). For the 907 patients who completed treatment with curative intent, 641 who had ICRT had a DSS of 45% at 5 years, compared with 24% for those treated with EBRT alone (p < 0.0001). Those who received > 52 Gy of EBRT to the central pelvis had DSS rates of 27-34%, compared with 53% for patients treated with lower doses of EBRT to the central pelvis and more intensive ICRT (p < 0.0001). At 5 years, the actuarial risk of major complications was also greater for patients treated with > 52 Gy of EBRT to the central pelvis (57-68%), compared with those who had 48-52 Gy (28%) and those who had < or = 47 Gy of EBRT to the central pelvis (15%) (p < 0.0001). Outcome was also compared for four time periods during which different treatment policies were in place for patients with Stage IIIB disease. The highest DSS (51%) and lowest actuarial complication rate (17%) were achieved during the most recent period (1981-1993) when modest doses of EBRT were combined with relatively intensive ICRT (p < 0.01 for both comparisons).
CONCLUSION: Aggressive use of ICRT, carefully balanced with pelvic EBRT, is necessary to achieve the best ratio between tumor control and complications for patients with FIGO Stage IIIB carcinoma of the cervix. In our experience, the highest DSS rates and the lowest complication rates were achieved with a combination of 40-45 Gy of EBRT combined with ICRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10098431     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00482-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  53 in total

Review 1.  Consensus on 3D treatment planning in gynaecologic brachytherapy of the Radiation Oncology Spanish Society (SEOR) Brachytherapy Group.

Authors:  José Luis Guinot; José Pérez-Calatayud; Silvia Rodríguez; Alejandro Tormo; Vincente Crispán; Juan Carlos Menéndez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Radiation dose-volume effects of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Akila N Viswanathan; Ellen D Yorke; Lawrence B Marks; Patricia J Eifel; William U Shipley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Risk factors and clinical aspects of recurrent invasive cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ghaemmaghami; Sorayya Saleh-Gargari; Behrokh Sahebdel; Nadereh Behtash; Farhad Samiei
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-09-04

Review 4.  Radiobiological considerations in combining doses from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ana M Tornero-López; Damián Guirado
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-02

Review 5.  Review of strategies for MRI based reconstruction of endocavitary and interstitial applicators in brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  José Richart; Vicente Carmona-Meseguer; Teresa García-Martínez; Antonio Herreros; Antonio Otal; Santiago Pellejero; Ana Tornero-López; José Pérez-Calatayud
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 6.  Recent developments and best practice in brachytherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  C D Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: the main process and common techniques.

Authors:  Zhongshan Liu; Yangzhi Zhao; Yunfeng Li; Jing Sun; Xia Lin; Tiejun Wang; Jie Guo
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation in the Management of Different Stages of Cervical Carcinoma: 5-year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Kamlesh Kumar Harsh; Akhil Kapoor; Murali Paramanandhan; Satya Narayan; Ramesh Purohit; Pramila Kumari; Mukesh Kumar Singhal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 9.  Image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  John A Vargo; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

10.  Correlation of point B and lymph node dose in 3D-planned high-dose-rate cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Larissa J Lee; Cheryl A Sadow; Anthony Russell; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.