Literature DB >> 10097932

Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in type 1 diabetic patients. A 7-year follow-up study.

H H Parving1, L Tarnow, F S Nielsen, P Rossing, T Mandrup-Poulsen, R Osterby, J Nerup.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate kidney function 7 years after the end of treatment with cyclosporine A (CsA) (initial dosage of 9.3 tapered off to 7.0 mg.kg-1.day-1) in young patients (mean age 20 years) with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes participating in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CsA trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this study, 21 patients received CsA for 12.5 +/- 4.0 months (mean +/- SD) and 19 patients received placebo for 14.4 +/- 3.8 months. The two groups were similar with regard to mean arterial blood pressure (BP), urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER), serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR [Cockcroft and Gault]) at initiation of CsA treatment (baseline). HbA1c (mean +/- SEM) during 7 years of follow-up was also the same: 8.7 +/- 0.4 vs. 8.3 +/- 0.4% in the CsA and placebo groups, respectively.
RESULTS: During the 7 years after cessation of study medication, two CsA group patients and one control patient were lost to follow-up. One placebo-treated patient developed IgA nephropathy (biopsy proven) and was excluded. Four CsA-treated patients developed persistently elevated UAER > 30 mg/24 h (n = 3 with microalbuminuria), whereas all the 17 placebo-treated patients had normal UAER (< 30 mg/24 h) after 7 years of follow-up. At the end of follow-up, the CsA group had a more pronounced rise in UAER: 2.5-fold (95% CI 1.4-4.5) higher than baseline value vs. 1.1-fold (0.7-1.7) in the placebo-treated group (P < 0.05). Estimated GFR (ml.min-1.1.73 m-2) declined from baseline to end of follow-up (1994) by 6.3 +/- 6.0 in the former CsA group, whereas it rose by 7.4 +/- 5.0 in the placebo group (P = 0.05). In 1994, 24-h blood pressure was nearly the same: 131/77 +/- 4/2 vs. 127/75 +/- 2/2 mmHg (NS) in the CsA and placebo groups, respectively. Five randomly selected CsA-treated patients had a kidney biopsy performed shortly after the CsA treatment was stopped. Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and/or arteriolopathy were present in two subjects who both subsequently developed persistent microalbuminuria.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our 7-year follow-up study suggested that short-lasting CsA treatment in young, newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients accelerated the rate of progression in UAER and tended to induce a loss in kidney function. Longer term follow-up is mandatory to clarify whether CsA-treated patients are at increased risk of developing clinical nephropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10097932     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.22.3.478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  18 in total

Review 1.  Clinical potential of antigen-specific therapies in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ken T Coppieters; Birgit Sehested Hansen; Matthias G von Herrath
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2012-12-28

Review 2.  Immunomodulatory therapy to preserve pancreatic β-cell function in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Frank Waldron-Lynch; Kevan C Herold
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Prevention strategies for type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Christopher M Kishiyama; H Peter Chase; Jennifer M Barker
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Polymeric nanomaterials for islet targeting and immunotherapeutic delivery.

Authors:  Kaustabh Ghosh; Mathumai Kanapathipillai; Netanel Korin; Jason R McCarthy; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  LEW.1WR1 rats develop autoimmune diabetes spontaneously and in response to environmental perturbation.

Authors:  John P Mordes; Dennis L Guberski; Jean H Leif; Bruce A Woda; Joan F Flanagan; Dale L Greiner; Edward H Kislauskis; Rebecca S Tirabassi
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 6.  Novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for autoimmune diabetes--a prime time to treat insulitis as a disease.

Authors:  Juha Grönholm; Michael J Lenardo
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 7.  Trials in type 1 diabetes: Antigen-specific therapies.

Authors:  Ken T Coppieters; Leonard C Harrison; Matthias G von Herrath
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 8.  Teplizumab therapy for type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Umesh B Masharani; Joseph Becker
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 9.  Antigen-based vs. systemic immunomodulation in type 1 diabetes: the pros and cons.

Authors:  Sofie Robert; Hannelie Korf; Conny Gysemans; Chantal Mathieu
Journal:  Islets       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 10.  New potential treatments for protection of pancreatic B-cell function in Type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  S Cernea; P Pozzilli
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.