Literature DB >> 10096327

MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques.

F Sardanelli1, F Zandrino, R C Parodi, G De Caro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare Gd-enhanced breath-hold fast imaging with steady-state precession (Gd-FISP) with unenhanced time-of-flight (TOF) sequences in evaluating internal carotid arteries (ICAs).
METHOD: Thirty patients underwent three unenhanced TOF sequences [2D traveling saturation (Travelsat); 3D tilted optimized nonsaturated excitation (TONE); TOF 3D Multislab] and two breath-hold 3D Gd-FISP sequences with automated intravenous contrast agent injection (axial and coronal). ICAs were classified as normal (no stenosis); with mild (<30%), moderate (30-70%), or severe stenosis; or occluded (100%). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with aortic arch injection was used as a reference technique.
RESULTS: DSA revealed 20 normal ICAs; 11 mild, 9 moderate, and 14 severe stenoses; and 2 occlusions. DSA and all MR angiography (MRA) sequences diagnosed the occlusion of four common carotid arteries. The TOF 2D overestimated 10 stenoses, TOF 3D TONE 9, and TOF 3D Multislab 5; Gd-FISP 3D overestimated only 2 of them, reaching the highest sensitivity and specificity for severe stenoses. Significant differences were found between the overestimation of Gd-FISP and each of the three unenhanced sequences (0.0020 < p < 0.0313, Wilcoxon and McNemar tests). Severe artifacts were observed with TOF techniques only.
CONCLUSION: Gd-FISP is an interesting, largely artifact-free improvement for MRA of ICAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10096327     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199903000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  8 in total

Review 1.  Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Marie E Westwood; Steven Kelly; Elizabeth Berry; John M Bamford; Michael J Gough; C Mark Airey; James F M Meaney; Linda M Davies; Jane Cullingworth; Michael A Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-26

2.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Utility of noninvasive studies in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Dean C C Johnston; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Clinical experience with MultiHance in CNS imaging.

Authors:  M Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of unenhanced and contrast enhanced techniques.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Val M Runge; John N Morelli; Kenneth D Williams; L Gill Naul; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality.

Authors:  X Leclerc; L Nicol; J Y Gauvrit; V Le Thuc; D Leys; J P Pruvo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound with second-generation contrast agents replace computed tomography angiography for distinguishing between occlusion and pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery?

Authors:  Carlos Augusto Pinto Ventura; Erasmo Simão da Silva; Giovanni Guido Cerri; Pedro Puech Leão; Adriano Tachibana; Maria Cristina Chammas
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.365

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.