Literature DB >> 10095972

Can intrauterine device removals for bleeding or pain be predicted at a one-month follow-up visit? A multivariate analysis.

J Stanback1, D Grimes.   

Abstract

From 4%-14% of intrauterine device (IUD) users have their IUD removed due to bleeding or pelvic pain in the first year of use. Past studies have analyzed whether baseline patient information can help predict such removals, but no previous analysis has examined whether information provided at the recommended 1-month follow-up visit could improve such predictions. Using data from an international multicenter randomized controlled trial, 89 women with removals for bleeding and pain after the 1-month visit were compared with 2536 continuing users. Logistic regression indicated several significant predictors of removal. Women reporting intermenstrual bleeding since last menses were nearly three times more likely to have removals for bleeding or pain (odds ratio [OR] 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-5.9). Similarly, those complaining of excessive menstrual flow were 3.5 times more likely to have removals within 12 months (95% CI 1.4-9.2). Women reporting these menstrual problems during scheduled revisits may benefit from counseling and treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Africa; Asia; Biology; Clinic Activities; Clinic Visits--women; Contraception; Contraception Termination--determinants; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Removal--determinants; Counseling--women; Developing Countries; Diseases; Family Planning; Iud--side effects; Latin America; Menstruation Disorders; Organization And Administration; Pain--women; Program Activities; Programs; Prospective Studies; Research Methodology; Research Report; Risk Factors--women; Service Statistics; Signs And Symptoms; Studies; Treatment; Women

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10095972     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00126-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  3 in total

1.  Continuation rates of two different-sized copper intrauterine devices among nulliparous women: Interim 12-month results of a single-blind, randomised, multicentre trial.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Courtney A Schreiber; David K Turok; Jeffrey T Jensen; Mitchell D Creinin; Kavita Nanda; Katharine O'Connell White; Ila Dayananda; Stephanie B Teal; Pai-Lien Chen; Beatrice A Chen; Alisa B Goldberg; Jennifer L Kerns; Clint Dart; Anita L Nelson; Michael A Thomas; David F Archer; Jill E Brown; Paula M Castaño; Anne E Burke; Bliss Kaneshiro; Diana L Blithe
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-16

2.  Biological evaluation of the copper/low-density polyethylene nanocomposite intrauterine device.

Authors:  Li-Xia Hu; Jing He; Li Hou; Hong Wang; Jun Li; Changsheng Xie; Zhuo Duan; Li-Kui Sun; Xin Wang; Changhong Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Alterations in the endometrium of rats, rabbits, and Macaca mulatta that received an implantation of copper/low-density polyethylene nanocomposite.

Authors:  Li-Xia Hu; Hong Wang; Meng Rao; Xiao-Ling Zhao; Jing Yang; Shi-Fu Hu; Jing He; Wei Xia; Hefang Liu; Bo Zhen; Haihong Di; Changsheng Xie; Xianping Xia; Changhong Zhu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-02-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.