Literature DB >> 10095513

The good, the bad and the relative, Part one: Conceptions of goodness in qualitative research.

C Emden1, M Sandelowski.   

Abstract

This (part one) paper traces efforts to define 'goodness' in qualitative research within various fields, including nursing. At first closely aligned with the traditional tenets of quantitative research (reliability and validity), over time these are found to be increasingly problematic to uphold within a qualitative context. As alternative criteria more appropriate to qualitative approaches are developed, in many instances these also are wanting in that they continue to reflect a search for order and certainty that permeates the quantitative domain. In reviewing various sets of criteria of goodness, the concepts of reliability and validity in relation to qualitative research are conceived as being championed, translated, exiled, redeemed and surpassed. Part two of the paper addresses the topic of goodness of qualitative research within the philosophical 'problem of the criterion'. Discussion extends to how researchers might usefully juxtapose the rationality of a modern world with a mounting postmodern sensibility.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10095513     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-172x.1998.00105.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1322-7114            Impact factor:   2.066


  3 in total

1.  Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Deborah J Cohen; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  LEARNS: A creative approach to analysing and representing narrative data incorporating photo-elicitation techniques.

Authors:  Wendy Marsh; Jen Leamon; Ann Robinson; Jill Shawe
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2018-02-15

3.  No one asked us: Understanding the lived experiences of midwives providing care in the north west suburbs of Melbourne during the COVID-19 pandemic: An interpretive phenomenology.

Authors:  Fran Hearn; Laura Biggs; Heather Wallace; Elisha Riggs
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.