Literature DB >> 10095356

[Indications and contraindications of lacrimal duct balloon dilatation].

H M Müller1, U Fries, J Berkefeld, A Thalhammer, J Kirchner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the indications and contraindications for balloon dacryocystoplasty.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: So far 85 patients with severe epiphora because of relative stenosis (n = 47) or occlusion (n = 38) of the nasolacrimal duct have undergone dilation. The success rates were evaluated during the acute phase and the follow-up period of 6-12 months. Treatment failures and recurrence of stenosis were analyzed and compared to the clinical and dacryocystographic indications prior to treatment.
RESULTS: A recanalization success rate of 79% was achieved in patients with isolated postsaccal stenoses or short-distance occlusions of the nasolacrimal duct. Patients with additional presaccal and saccal stenoses, filling defects in the duct lumen, or long-distance occlusions had lower initial recanalization rates (66%). Main predictors for recurrent obstructions were active inflammation, filling defects due to calculi, extensive occlusion and post-traumatic lesions. In the absence of these factors 12-month patency rates of 80% were proved.
CONCLUSION: Dacryocystoplasty procedures should preferably be performed in patients with circumscribed functional postsaccal stenosis. In these cases a success rate of about 80% is possible. Otherwise the value of the intervention is limited by high failure and recurrence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10095356     DOI: 10.1007/s003470050382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  3 in total

1.  [Balloon dilatation and Stentimplantation of the nasolacrimal duct for chronic epiphora].

Authors:  U Lachmund; D Ammann-Rauch; A Forrer; M Grob; C Petralli; L Remonda; T Roeren; K Wilhelm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Balloon dilatation of the canaliculus communis for chronic epiphora].

Authors:  U Lachmund; D Ammann; A Forrer; C Petralli; L Remonda; T Roeren; F Vonmoos; K Wilhelm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of epiphora.

Authors:  Francesca Patella; Silvia Panella; Stefania Zannoni; Maria Laura Jannone; Filippo Pesapane; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Sara Sbaraini; Anna Maria Ierardi; Simone Soldi; Giuseppe Franceschelli; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.