F Nuwaha1. 1. Department of Community Health, Mbarara University, Uganda.
Abstract
SETTING: Rakai and Mbarara districts, south-western Uganda. OBJECTIVE: To compare compliance and other treatment outcomes with tuberculosis (TB) treatment for Rakai and Mbarara districts, and to elucidate factors associated with the disparity. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort analysis of tuberculosis treatment outcomes for the period 1992-1996. Predictors for compliance were examined for 1995 using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Of the surviving patients, 57% finished treatment in Mbarara compared to 92% in Rakai. Enhanced compliance on univariate analysis was associated with being smear positive; previous TB treatment; use of short-course chemotherapy; return for repeat smear; no change of health unit; no change of district; registration in Rakai; and not being hospitalised. On multivariate analysis, being smear positive, previous TB treatment, hospitalisation and registration site were not significant. The highest risk for default was unit change after the intensive phase of treatment, with an adjusted odds ratio of 17.53. The highest differences in the two districts were for the hospitalisation and unit change rates, with corresponding odds ratios of 52 and 0.06. CONCLUSIONS: Initial hospitalisation of TB patients is not necessary for subsequent completion of treatment. Use of one health unit for both the intensive and continuation phase of treatment may improve compliance.
SETTING: Rakai and Mbarara districts, south-western Uganda. OBJECTIVE: To compare compliance and other treatment outcomes with tuberculosis (TB) treatment for Rakai and Mbarara districts, and to elucidate factors associated with the disparity. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort analysis of tuberculosis treatment outcomes for the period 1992-1996. Predictors for compliance were examined for 1995 using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Of the surviving patients, 57% finished treatment in Mbarara compared to 92% in Rakai. Enhanced compliance on univariate analysis was associated with being smear positive; previous TB treatment; use of short-course chemotherapy; return for repeat smear; no change of health unit; no change of district; registration in Rakai; and not being hospitalised. On multivariate analysis, being smear positive, previous TB treatment, hospitalisation and registration site were not significant. The highest risk for default was unit change after the intensive phase of treatment, with an adjusted odds ratio of 17.53. The highest differences in the two districts were for the hospitalisation and unit change rates, with corresponding odds ratios of 52 and 0.06. CONCLUSIONS: Initial hospitalisation of TB patients is not necessary for subsequent completion of treatment. Use of one health unit for both the intensive and continuation phase of treatment may improve compliance.
Authors: Sabine M Hermans; Barbara Castelnuovo; Catherine Katabira; Peter Mbidde; Joep M A Lange; Andy I M Hoepelman; Alex Coutinho; Yukari C Manabe Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Monica G Amuha; Paul Kutyabami; Freddy E Kitutu; Richard Odoi-Adome; Joan N Kalyango Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2009-08-01 Impact factor: 0.927
Authors: Yara Voss De Lima; Denise Evans; Liesl Page-Shipp; Antonia Barnard; Ian Sanne; Colin N Menezes; Annelies Van Rie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240