Literature DB >> 10094159

The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals.

N Kanwisher1, D Stanley, A Harris.   

Abstract

To test whether the human fusiform face area (FFA) responds not only to faces but to anything human or animate, we used fMRI to measure the response of the FFA to six new stimulus categories. The strongest responses were to stimuli containing faces: human faces (2.0% signal increase from fixation baseline) and human heads (1.7%), with weaker but still strong responses to whole humans (1.5%) and animal heads (1.3%). Responses to whole animals (1.0%) and human bodies without heads (1.0%) were significantly stronger than responses to inanimate objects (0.7%), but responses to animal bodies without heads (0.8%) were not. These results demonstrate that the FFA is selective for faces, not for animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10094159     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199901180-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  45 in total

1.  Visual exploration of form and position with identical stimuli: functional anatomy with PET.

Authors:  Z Vidnyánszky; B Gulyás; P E Roland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Seeing faces in the noise: stochastic activity in perceptual regions of the brain may influence the perception of ambiguous stimuli.

Authors:  Heather A Wild; Thomas A Busey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  Categorical, yet graded--single-image activation profiles of human category-selective cortical regions.

Authors:  Marieke Mur; Douglas A Ruff; Jerzy Bodurka; Peter De Weerd; Peter A Bandettini; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Moving Toward Integrative, Multidimensional Research in Modern Psychiatry: Lessons Learned From Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Lawrence K Fung; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Within-subject reproducibility of category-specific visual activation with functional MRI.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Development of structure and function in the infant brain: implications for cognition, language and social behaviour.

Authors:  Sarah J Paterson; Sabine Heim; Jennifer Thomas Friedman; Naseem Choudhury; April A Benasich
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Bayesian comparison of spatially regularised general linear models.

Authors:  Will Penny; Guillaume Flandin; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream.

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon; Shawn C Milleville; Gioia A L Negri; Raffaella I Rumiati; Alfonso Caramazza; Alex Martin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Regional specificity of aberrant thalamocortical connectivity in autism.

Authors:  Aarti Nair; Ruth A Carper; Angela E Abbott; Colleen P Chen; Seraphina Solders; Sarah Nakutin; Michael C Datko; Inna Fishman; Ralph-Axel Müller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.