Literature DB >> 10094065

Driving toward guiding principles: a goal for privacy, confidentiality, and security of health information.

S A Buckovich1, H E Rippen, M J Rozen.   

Abstract

As health care moves from paper to electronic data collection, providing easier access and dissemination of health information, the development of guiding privacy, confidentiality, and security principles is necessary to help balance the protection of patients' privacy interests against appropriate information access. A comparative review and analysis was done, based on a compilation of privacy, confidentiality, and security principles from many sources. Principles derived from ten identified sources were compared with each of the compiled principles to assess support level, uniformity, and inconsistencies. Of 28 compiled principles, 23 were supported by at least 50 percent of the sources. Technology could address at least 12 of the principles. Notable consistencies among the principles could provide a basis for consensus for further legislative and organizational work. It is imperative that all participants in our health care system work actively toward a viable resolution of this information privacy debate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Society for Testing and Materials; Association of American Medical Colleges; Center for Democracy and Technology; Computer-based Patient Record Institute; Empirical Approach; Koop Foundation; Medical Privacy and Security Protection Act 1998; National Association of Insurance Commissioners; National Research Council; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10094065      PMCID: PMC61351          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  1 in total

1.  Standards bearers. The standardization of healthcare information gains momentum.

Authors:  J Blair
Journal:  Healthc Inform       Date:  1998-02
  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Development of CPR security using impact analysis.

Authors:  J Salazar-Kish; D Tate; P D Hall; K Homa
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Effects of data anonymization by cell suppression on descriptive statistics and predictive modeling performance.

Authors:  L Ohno-Machado; S A Vinterbo; S Dreiseitl
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

3.  Disambiguation data: extracting information from anonymized sources.

Authors:  S Dreiseitl; S Vinterbo; L Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

4.  Fuzzy assessment of health information system users' security awareness.

Authors:  Özlem Müge Aydın; Oumout Chouseinoglou
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information: report of a national consensus process.

Authors:  M K Wynia; S S Coughlin; S Alpert; D S Cummins; L L Emanuel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Gaps, conflicts, and consensus in the ethics statements of professional associations, medical groups, and health plans.

Authors:  N D Berkman; M K Wynia; L R Churchill
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Security requirements for a lifelong electronic health record system: an opinion.

Authors:  J Wainer; C J R Campos; M D U Salinas; D Sigulem
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2008-12-24

Review 8.  Translational biomedical informatics in the cloud: present and future.

Authors:  Jiajia Chen; Fuliang Qian; Wenying Yan; Bairong Shen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Privacy-preserving health data collection for preschool children.

Authors:  Shaopeng Guan; Yuan Zhang; Yue Ji
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.238

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.