Literature DB >> 10093806

Coating titanium implants with bioglass and with hydroxyapatite. A comparative study in sheep.

S Lopez-Sastre1, J M Gonzalo-Orden, J A Altónaga, J R Altónaga, M A Orden.   

Abstract

This study compares the osteointegration of titanium implants coated with bioglass (Biovetro GSB formula) and with hydroxyapatite (HAP). Twenty-four bioglass-coated and 24 HAP-coated cylinders were implanted in the femoral diaphyses of sheep, and examined after 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. The HAP coating gave a stronger and earlier fixation to the bone than did bioglass. Bioglass formed a tissue interface which showed a macrophage reaction with little new bone formation activity. In contrast, HPA, showed intense new bone formation, with highly mineralised osseous trabeculae in the neighbourhood of the interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10093806      PMCID: PMC3619677          DOI: 10.1007/s002640050282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  2 in total

1.  Bioactive coating of zirconia toughened alumina ceramic implants improves cancellous osseointegration.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Pobloth; Max J Mersiowsky; Luisa Kliemt; Hanna Schell; Anke Dienelt; Berit M Pfitzner; Rainer Burgkart; Rainer Detsch; Dag Wulsten; Aldo R Boccaccini; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Bioactive Surfaces vs. Conventional Surfaces in Titanium Dental Implants: A Comparative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nansi López-Valverde; Javier Flores-Fraile; Juan Manuel Ramírez; Bruno Macedo de Sousa; Silvia Herrero-Hernández; Antonio López-Valverde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.