BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to assess the value of routine imaging and liver function tests in detecting metastases from malignant melanoma of the uvea. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma between 1985 and 1996 who had participated in a screening program that included annual liver function tests (LFT), chest X-ray, and abdominal ultrasonography (US) were eligible for this retrospective cohort study. Main outcome measures were the sensitivity of screening tests, presence of symptoms, recurrence free interval, and metastatic burden. RESULTS: Metastases were diagnosed in 74% of patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 59-86) at screening and in 26% (95% CI, 14-41) when the patient consulted a physician because of symptoms that developed before the next scheduled visit. Of all the patients, 59% (95% CI, 43-73) were asymptomatic, and 80% (95% CI, 66-91) had only hepatic metastases. The median recurrence free interval, greatest dimension of the largest metastasis, and metastatic burden of the two groups did not differ. US was diagnostic in 78% (95% CI, 64-89), at least 1 LFT test was abnormal in 70% of patients (95% CI, 54-82), and a chest X-ray was abnormal in 2% of patients (95% CI, 0-12). LFTs and US did not reveal hepatic metastases in 33% and 4% of patients, respectively. The sensitivity of individual LFTs ranged from 0.27 to 0.67, and their specificity from 0.90 to 0.96, with lactate dehydrogenase being the most sensitive LFT used. CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that annual screening with LFTs and abdominal US will identify 59% of patients while they are still asymptomatic and that semiannual screening will detect >95% of such patients. Chest X-ray has a very low yield and is recommended only at baseline to exclude metastatic disease to the eye and if pulmonary symptoms develop.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to assess the value of routine imaging and liver function tests in detecting metastases from malignant melanoma of the uvea. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma between 1985 and 1996 who had participated in a screening program that included annual liver function tests (LFT), chest X-ray, and abdominal ultrasonography (US) were eligible for this retrospective cohort study. Main outcome measures were the sensitivity of screening tests, presence of symptoms, recurrence free interval, and metastatic burden. RESULTS:Metastases were diagnosed in 74% of patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 59-86) at screening and in 26% (95% CI, 14-41) when the patient consulted a physician because of symptoms that developed before the next scheduled visit. Of all the patients, 59% (95% CI, 43-73) were asymptomatic, and 80% (95% CI, 66-91) had only hepatic metastases. The median recurrence free interval, greatest dimension of the largest metastasis, and metastatic burden of the two groups did not differ. US was diagnostic in 78% (95% CI, 64-89), at least 1 LFT test was abnormal in 70% of patients (95% CI, 54-82), and a chest X-ray was abnormal in 2% of patients (95% CI, 0-12). LFTs and US did not reveal hepatic metastases in 33% and 4% of patients, respectively. The sensitivity of individual LFTs ranged from 0.27 to 0.67, and their specificity from 0.90 to 0.96, with lactate dehydrogenase being the most sensitive LFT used. CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that annual screening with LFTs and abdominal US will identify 59% of patients while they are still asymptomatic and that semiannual screening will detect >95% of such patients. Chest X-ray has a very low yield and is recommended only at baseline to exclude metastatic disease to the eye and if pulmonary symptoms develop.
Authors: Daniela Suesskind; Andreas Schatz; Sven Schnichels; Sarah E Coupland; Sarah L Lake; Bernd Wissinger; Karl U Bartz-Schmidt; Sigrid Henke-Fahle Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Duncan E Berry; Amy C Schefler; Michael I Seider; Miguel Materin; Sandra Stinnett; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya Journal: Retina Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: I W Reiniger; U C Schaller; C Haritoglou; R Hein; A K Bosserhoff; A Kampik; A J Mueller Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2005-05-20 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Alexandre Doussot; Charlée Nardin; Haruyuki Takaki; Tess D Litchman; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Michael A Postow; Joseph P Erinjeri; T Peter Kingham Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Mariam Kouch-el Filali; Emine Kilic; Marleen Melis; Annelies de Klein; Marion de Jong; Gregorius P M Luyten Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 3.117