Literature DB >> 10091762

Increasing dose intensity of cisplatin-etoposide in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a phase III randomized trial of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group.

A Font1, A J Moyano, J M Puerto, A Tres, C Garcia-Giron, I Barneto, A Anton, J J Sanchez, A Salvador, R Rosell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors designed this randomized, controlled trial to assess whether dose intensification of a cisplatin-etoposide combination (PE), achieved by shortening the interval between chemotherapy cycles, would improve response rate and survival. The maximum tolerated dose of PE was administered in either 3- or 4-week cycles to patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).
METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients were randomized into two groups. The dose-intense arm received cisplatin 35 mg/m2 and etoposide 200 mg/m2 on Days 1-3 every 4 weeks. The dose-dense arm received the same schedule every 3 weeks along with 5 microg/kg of recombinant human granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) administered subcutaneously on Days 4-13.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced in both treatment arms. Fifty-four percent of patients were classified as Stage IIIB. A 32% increase in relative dose intensity was achieved in the dose-dense arm compared with the dose-intense arm. The response rates were 32% in the dose-intense arm and 27% in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.9). The median overall survival was higher in the dose-dense arm, 9 versus 7.2 months (P = 0.2). The main toxicity was myelosuppression, although the administration of GM-CSF significantly reduced the percentage of patients with Grade 4 granulocytopenia (53% vs. 78%). Fifty-four percent of the patients in the dose-intense arm and 35% of those in the dose-dense arm developed febrile neutropenia (P = 0.07). There were ten (8%) treatment-related deaths, three (4%) in the dose-intense arm and seven (12%) in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.3); three deaths in each arm were due to febrile neutropenia.
CONCLUSIONS: The dose-intensification achieved in the dose-dense PE regimen did not correlate with significant improvements in response rate or survival and cannot be recommended in the light of the diversity of new drug combinations available today. However, the use of rhGM-CSF significantly reduced the incidence of severe granulocytopenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10091762     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990215)85:4<855::aid-cncr12>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

Review 1.  A way forward on the medically appropriate use of white cell growth factors.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Louise André; Gabriel Antherieu; Amélie Boinet; Judith Bret; Thomas Gilbert; Rabia Boulahssass; Claire Falandry
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving biosimilar filgrastim for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced/febrile neutropaenia: Results from the MONITOR-GCSF study.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Andriy Krendyukov; Nadja Höbel; Pere Gascon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.328

4.  Phase I/II study of oral etoposide plus GM-CSF as second-line chemotherapy in platinum-pretreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Baur; E Schernhammer; M Gneist; P Sevelda; P Speiser; M Hudec; Ch Dittrich
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Risk Factors for Infections, Antibiotic Therapy, and Its Impact on Cancer Therapy Outcomes for Patients with Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Ondřej Kubeček; Pavla Paterová; Martina Novosadová
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11

6.  Adaptive intrapatient dose escalation of cisplatin in combination with low-dose vp16 in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J H M Schellens; A S T Planting; N van Zandwijk; J Ma; M Maliepaard; M E L van der Burg; M de Boer-Dennert; E Brouwer; A van der Gaast; M J van den Bent; J Verweij
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.