Literature DB >> 10091275

Physical training and exercise-related injuries. Surveillance, research and injury prevention in military populations.

B H Jones1, J J Knapik.   

Abstract

Athletes and soldiers must both develop and maintain high levels of physical fitness for the physically demanding tasks they perform; however, the routine physical activity necessary to achieve and sustain fitness can result in training-related injuries. This article reviews data from a systematic injury control programme developed by the US Army. Injury control requires 5 major steps: (i) surveillance to determine the size of the injury problem; (ii) studies to determine causes and risk factors for these injuries; (iii) studies to ascertain whether proposed interventions actually reduce injuries; (iv) implementation of effective interventions; and (v) monitoring to see whether interventions retain their effectiveness. Medical surveillance data from the US Army indicate that unintentional (accidental) injuries cause about 50% of deaths, 50% of disabilities, 30% of hospitalisations and 40 to 60% of outpatient visits. Epidemiological surveys show that the cumulative incidence of injuries (requiring an outpatient visit) in the 8 weeks of US Army basic training is about 25% for men and 55% for women; incidence rates for operational infantry, special forces and ranger units are about 10 to 12 injuries/100 soldier-months. Of the limited-duty days accrued by trainees and infantry soldiers who were treated in outpatient clinics, 80 to 90% were the result of training-related injuries. US Army studies document a number of potentially modifiable risk factors for these injuries, which include high amounts of running, low levels of physical fitness, high and low levels of flexibility, sedentary lifestyle and tobacco use, amongst others. Studies directed at interventions showed that limiting running distance can reduce the risk for stress fractures, that the use of ankle braces can reduce the likelihood of ankle sprains during airborne operations and that the use of shock-absorbing insoles does not reduce stress fractures during training. The US Army continues to develop a comprehensive injury prevention programme encompassing surveillance, research, programme implementation and monitoring. The findings from this programme, and the general principles of injury control therein, have a wide application in civilian sports and exercise programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10091275     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199927020-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  36 in total

1.  A prospective study of the effect of the appropriateness of foot-shoe fit and training shoe type on the incidence of overuse injuries among infantry recruits.

Authors:  A Finestone; N Shlamkovitch; A Eldad; A Karp; C Milgrom
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Analysis of extrinsic factor associated with 379 injuries occurring during 34,236 military parachute descents.

Authors:  L P Lillywhite
Journal:  J R Army Med Corps       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 3.  Biomechanical risk factors for exercise-related lower limb injuries.

Authors:  F G Neely
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Risk of injury in soldiers.

Authors:  J P Tomlinson; W M Lednar; J D Jackson
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research.

Authors:  C J Caspersen; K E Powell; G M Christenson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  Running injuries.

Authors:  D M Brody
Journal:  Clin Symp       Date:  1980

7.  Epidemiology of injuries associated with physical training among young men in the army.

Authors:  B H Jones; D N Cowan; J P Tomlinson; J R Robinson; D W Polly; P N Frykman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Cigarette smoking, physical fitness, and injuries in infantry soldiers.

Authors:  K L Reynolds; H A Heckel; C E Witt; J W Martin; J A Pollard; J J Knapik; B H Jones
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Stress fractures in 295 trainees: a one-year study of incidence as related to age, sex, and race.

Authors:  T J Brudvig; T D Gudger; L Obermeyer
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Injuries in high school sports.

Authors:  J G Garrick; R K Requa
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  49 in total

1.  Association of Injury History and Incident Injury in Cadet Basic Military Training.

Authors:  Kristen L Kucera; Stephen W Marshall; Susanne H Wolf; Darin A Padua; Kenneth L Cameron; Anthony I Beutler
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Is High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT)/CrossFit Safe for Military Fitness Training?

Authors:  Walker S C Poston; Christopher K Haddock; Katie M Heinrich; Sara A Jahnke; Nattinee Jitnarin; David B Batchelor
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Role of gymnastics in the Army School of Physical Training.

Authors:  D E Griffiths; R Hargrove; J Clasper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate women's basketball injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 through 2003-2004.

Authors:  Julie Agel; David E Olson; Randall Dick; Elizabeth A Arendt; Stephen W Marshall; Robby S Sikka
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Summary statement: appropriate medical care for the secondary school-aged athlete.

Authors:  Jon Almquist; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Angela Cavanna; Dave Jenkinson; Andrew E Lincoln; Keith Loud; Bart C Peterson; Craig Portwood; John Reynolds; Thomas S Woods
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion.

Authors:  Henry Wang; Scott Dueball
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Commentary: Time for a paradigm shift in conceptualizing risk factors in sports injury research.

Authors:  Kenneth L Cameron
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Department of defense chiropractic internships: a survey of internship participants and nonparticipants.

Authors:  Andrew S Dunn
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2006

9.  Aetiology and risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders in physically active conscripts: a follow-up study in the Finnish Defence Forces.

Authors:  Henri Taanila; Jaana Suni; Harri Pihlajamäki; Ville M Mattila; Olli Ohrankämmen; Petteri Vuorinen; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Musculoskeletal disorders in physically active conscripts: a one-year follow-up study in the Finnish Defence Forces.

Authors:  Henri Taanila; Jaana Suni; Harri Pihlajamäki; Ville M Mattila; Olli Ohrankämmen; Petteri Vuorinen; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.