Literature DB >> 10091118

Predicting relative binding affinities of non-peptide HIV protease inhibitors with free energy perturbation calculations.

M A McCarrick1, P A Kollman.   

Abstract

The relative binding free energies in HIV protease of haloperidol thioketal (THK) and three of its derivatives were examined with free energy calculations. THK is a weak inhibitor (IC50 = 15 microM) for which two cocrystal structures with HIV type 1 proteases have been solved [Rutenber, E. et al., J. Biol. Chem., 268 (1993) 15343]. A THK derivative with a phenyl group on C2 of the piperidine ring was expected to be a poor inhibitor based on experiments with haloperidol ketal and its 2-phenyl derivative (Caldera, P., personal communication). Our calculations predict that a 5-phenyl THK derivative, suggested based on examination of the crystal structure, will bind significantly better than THK. Although there are large error bars as estimated from hysteresis, the calculations predict that the 5-phenyl substituent is clearly favored over the 2-phenyl derivative as well as the parent compound. The unfavorable free energies of solvation of both phenyl THK derivatives relative to the parent compound contributed to their predicted binding free energies. In a third simulation, the change in binding free energy for 5-benzyl THK relative to THK was calculated. Although this derivative has a lower free energy in the protein, its decreased free energy of solvation increases the predicted delta delta G (bind) to the same range as that of the 2-phenyl derivative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10091118     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008044721715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  18 in total

1.  X-ray crystallographic structure of a complex between a synthetic protease of human immunodeficiency virus 1 and a substrate-based hydroxyethylamine inhibitor.

Authors:  A L Swain; M M Miller; J Green; D H Rich; J Schneider; S B Kent; A Wlodawer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Free energy component analysis: application to the "Z-phobicity" of A-T base pairs.

Authors:  S B Singh; D A Pearlman; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1993-10

3.  Relative binding free energies of peptide inhibitors of HIV-1 protease: the influence of the active site protonation state.

Authors:  X Chen; A Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Application of free energy simulations to the binding of a transition-state-analogue inhibitor to HIV protease.

Authors:  A Tropsha; J Hermans
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1992-01

5.  Structure-based design of nonpeptide inhibitors specific for the human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease.

Authors:  R L DesJarlais; G L Seibel; I D Kuntz; P S Furth; J C Alvarez; P R Ortiz de Montellano; D L DeCamp; L M Babé; C S Craik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Lipophilic, acid-stable, adenosine deaminase-activated anti-HIV prodrugs for central nervous system delivery. 3. 6-Amino prodrugs of 2'-beta-fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyinosine.

Authors:  J S Driscoll; M A Siddiqui; H Ford; J A Kelley; J S Roth; H Mitsuya; M Tanaka; V E Marquez
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-04-12       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Structure of a non-peptide inhibitor complexed with HIV-1 protease. Developing a cycle of structure-based drug design.

Authors:  E Rutenber; E B Fauman; R J Keenan; S Fong; P S Furth; P R Ortiz de Montellano; E Meng; I D Kuntz; D L DeCamp; R Salto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Relative differences in the binding free energies of human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease inhibitors: a thermodynamic cycle-perturbation approach.

Authors:  M R Reddy; V N Viswanadhan; J N Weinstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Structure of complex of synthetic HIV-1 protease with a substrate-based inhibitor at 2.3 A resolution.

Authors:  M Miller; J Schneider; B K Sathyanarayana; M V Toth; G R Marshall; L Clawson; L Selk; S B Kent; A Wlodawer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Free energy calculations of the mutation of Ile96-->Ala in barnase: contributions to the difference in stability.

Authors:  Y C Sun; D L Veenstra; P A Kollman
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1996-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Structure-based phenotyping predicts HIV-1 protease inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Mark D Shenderovich; Ron M Kagan; Peter N R Heseltine; Kal Ramnarayan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Improved convergence of binding affinities with free energy perturbation: application to nonpeptide ligands with pp60src SH2 domain.

Authors:  D J Price; W L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Modeling Protein-Ligand Binding by Mining Minima.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Michael K Gilson; Simon P Webb; Michael J Potter
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 6.006

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.