Literature DB >> 10090926

Prospective randomized multicenter study comparing cyclosporin alone versus the combination of antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin for treatment of patients with nonsevere aplastic anemia: a report from the European Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Party.

J Marsh1, H Schrezenmeier, P Marin, O Ilhan, P Ljungman, S McCann, G Socie, A Tichelli, J Passweg, J Hows, A Raghavachar, A Locasciulli, A Bacigalupo.   

Abstract

We report the results of the first prospective randomized multicenter study of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with previously untreated nonsevere aplastic anemia (AA) as defined by a neutrophil count of at least 0.5 x 10(9)/L and transfusion dependence. Patients were randomized to receive cyclosporin (CSA) alone or the combination of horse antithymocyte globulin ([ATG] Lymphoglobuline; Merieux, Lyon, France) and CSA. The endpoint of the study was the hematologic response at 6 months. One hundred fifteen patients were randomized and assessable with a median follow-up period of 36 months; 61 received CSA and 54 ATG and CSA. In the CSA group, the percentage of complete and partial responders was 23% and 23%, respectively, for an overall response rate of 46%. A significantly higher overall response rate of 74% was found in the ATG and CSA group, with 57% complete and 17% partial responders (P =. 02). Compared with CSA alone, the combination of ATG and CSA resulted in a significantly higher median hemoglobin level and platelet count at 6 months. Fewer patients required a second course of treatment before 6 months due to a nonresponse. In the CSA group, 15 of 61 (25%) patients required a course of ATG before 6 months because of disease progression, compared with only 3 of 54 (6%) in the ATG and CSA group. The survival probabilities for the two groups were comparable, 93% (CSA group) and 91% (ATG and CSA group), but at 180 days, the prevalence of patients surviving free of transfusions, which excluded patients requiring second treatment because of nonresponse, death, disease progression, or relapse, was 67% in the CSA group and 90% in the ATG and CSA group (P =.001). We conclude that the combination of ATG and CSA is superior to CSA alone in terms of the hematologic response, the quality of response, and early mortality, and a second course of immunosuppression is less frequently required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10090926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  48 in total

1.  Optimization of therapy for severe aplastic anemia based on clinical, biologic, and treatment response parameters: conclusions of an international working group on severe aplastic anemia convened by the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, March 2010.

Authors:  Michael A Pulsipher; Neal S Young; Jakub Tolar; Antonio M Risitano; H Joachim Deeg; Paolo Anderlini; Rodrigo Calado; Seiji Kojima; Mary Eapen; Richard Harris; Phillip Scheinberg; Sharon Savage; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Ramon V Tiu; Nancy DiFronzo; Mary M Horowitz; Joseph H Antin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Clinical management of aplastic anemia.

Authors:  Amy E Dezern; Robert A Brodsky
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.929

3.  Immunosuppressive treatment for aplastic anemia: are we hitting the ceiling?

Authors:  Jakob R Passweg; André Tichelli
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Outcome of Cyclosporine Monotherapy in Patients of Aplastic Anemia: Experience of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India.

Authors:  Prakas Kumar Mandal; Suvraneel Baul; Tuphan Kanti Dolai; Rajib De; Prantar Chakrabarti
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 0.900

5.  Antithymocyte globulin combined with cyclosporine A down-regulates T helper 1 cells by modulating T cell immune response cDNA 7 in aplastic anemia.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Jianlin Qiao; Xiao-min Zhong; Qing-yun Wu; Wei Chen; Yao Yao; Ming-shan Niu; Chun-ling Fu; Ling-yu Zeng; Zhen-yu Li; Kai-lin Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Clinical and morphological predictors of outcome in older aplastic anemia patients treated with eltrombopag.

Authors:  Bruno Fattizzo; Austin G Kulasekararaj; Anita Hill; Nana Benson-Quarm; Morag Griffin; Talha Munir; Louise Arnold; Kathryn Riley; Robin Ireland; Hugues De Lavallade; Victoria Potter; Dario Consonni; Peter Hillmen; Ghulam J Mufti; Wilma Barcellini; Judith C W Marsh
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin: standard of care also for older patients with aplastic anemia.

Authors:  Andrea Bacigalupo
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Long-term follow-up of patients with aplastic anemia and refractory anemia responding to combination therapy with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin.

Authors:  Akira Matsuda; Kuniya Kishimoto; Katsuhiko Yoshida; Fumiharu Yagasaki; Yoshihiro Ito; Tohru Sakata; Nobutaka Kawai; Hirohide Ino; Kunitake Hirashima; Masami Bessho
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Clinical course of non-severe aplastic anemia in adults.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Kwon; Inho Kim; Yun Gyoo Lee; Youngil Koh; Hayne Cho Park; Eun Young Song; Hyun Kyung Kim; Sung Soo Yoon; Dong Soon Lee; Sung Sup Park; Hee Young Shin; Seonyang Park; Myoung Hee Park; Hyo Seop Ahn; Byoung-Kook Kim
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 2.490

10.  Clinical outcomes in adult patients with aplastic anemia: A single institution experience.

Authors:  Prajwal Boddu; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Farhad Ravandi; Gautam Borthakur; Elias Jabbour; Courtney DiNardo; Nitin Jain; Naval Daver; Naveen Pemmaraju; Paolo Anderlini; Simrit Parmar; Devendra Kc; Mary Akosile; Sherry A Pierce; Richard Champlin; Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian; Tapan Kadia
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 10.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.