Literature DB >> 10090611

Differences in the recognition by CTL of peptides presented by the HLA-B*4402 and the HLA-B*4403 molecules which differ by a single amino acid.

J Herman1, V Jongeneel, D Kuznetsov, P G Coulie.   

Abstract

The HLA-B*4402 and B*4403 molecules differ only at residue 156, which borders the peptide binding site. Strong in vivo allogeneic reactions mediated by cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were reported in patients who received a bone marrow graft mismatched for these B44 subtypes, indicating that HLA-B*4402 and B*4403 molecules present distinct antigens. This could be due either to the presentation of different sets of antigenic peptides or to the recognition by CTLs of conformational epitopes formed by the MHC molecules alone or in association with antigenic peptides. To address this question, we compared the two B44 subtypes in their presentation to tumor-specific CTLs of three peptides, encoded by genes MAGE-3, MUM-1 and Tyrosinase. The peptides bound with similar affinities to B*4402 or B*4403 molecules, as assessed by lytic competition assays. One HLA-B*4402-restricted and one HLA-B*4403-restricted CTL clone were derived against each peptide. When tested for lysis of B*4402 and B*4403 cells incubated with the antigenic peptides, most CTLs showed a marked preference for one of the two B44 subtypes. Using variant peptides incorporating single alanine substitutions, we compared a given CTLs' recognition of its antigenic peptide presented by both B44 subtypes. Some substitutions, which had no effect on the binding of the peptide, affected its recognition by the same CTL differently on B*4402 and B*4403 molecules. These results imply that the conformations adopted by the same peptide on the two HLA-B44 subtypes are different. We conclude that the B44 subtype specificity of T cells results mostly from distinct conformations adopted by the same peptides in the two B44 molecules. This does not exclude the possibility that in some cases the B44 subtype specificity results from the selective binding of a peptide to one subtype. We found several peptides, different from the three mentioned above, that contain the canonical HLA-B44 binding motif and bind to B*4403 but not to B*4402 molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10090611     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0039.1999.530201.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Antigens        ISSN: 0001-2815


  9 in total

1.  Peptide-binding motif of HLA-A*6603.

Authors:  Christina Bade-Doeding; Britta Eiz-Vesper; Constanca Figueiredo; Axel Seltsam; Holger-Andreas Elsner; Rainer Blasczyk
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 2.846

2.  A biochemical and structural analysis of genetic diversity within the HLA-A*11 subtype.

Authors:  Lenong Li; Weifeng Chen; Marlene Bouvier
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 2.846

3.  A single amino-acid polymorphism in pocket A of HLA-A*6602 alters the auxiliary anchors compared with HLA-A*6601 ligands.

Authors:  Christina Bade-Doeding; Holger-Andreas Elsner; Britta Eiz-Vesper; Axel Seltsam; Ute Holtkamp; Rainer Blasczyk
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  KIR-HLA-A and B alleles of the Bw4 epitope against HIV infection in discordant heterosexual couples in Chaco Argentina.

Authors:  Alicia Habegger de Sorrentino; Jessica L Sinchi; Karina Marinic; Rosana López; Ernesto Iliovich
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Peptidomes and Structures Illustrate Two Distinguishing Mechanisms of Alternating the Peptide Plasticity Caused by Swine MHC Class I Micropolymorphism.

Authors:  Xiaohui Wei; Song Wang; Zhuolin Li; Zibin Li; Zehui Qu; Suqiu Wang; Baohua Zou; Ruiying Liang; Chun Xia; Nianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  TCR cross-reactivity and allorecognition: new insights into the immunogenetics of allorecognition.

Authors:  L J D'Orsogna; D L Roelen; I I N Doxiadis; F H J Claas
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.846

7.  Zooming into the binding groove of HLA molecules: which positions and which substitutions change peptide binding most?

Authors:  Hanneke W M van Deutekom; Can Keşmir
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.846

8.  Soluble HLA technology as a strategy to evaluate the impact of HLA mismatches.

Authors:  Heike Kunze-Schumacher; Rainer Blasczyk; Christina Bade-Doeding
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.818

9.  A naturally selected dimorphism within the HLA-B44 supertype alters class I structure, peptide repertoire, and T cell recognition.

Authors:  Whitney A Macdonald; Anthony W Purcell; Nicole A Mifsud; Lauren K Ely; David S Williams; Linus Chang; Jeffrey J Gorman; Craig S Clements; Lars Kjer-Nielsen; David M Koelle; Scott R Burrows; Brian D Tait; Rhonda Holdsworth; Andrew G Brooks; George O Lovrecz; Louis Lu; Jamie Rossjohn; James McCluskey
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2003-08-25       Impact factor: 14.307

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.