H Lüdtke1, C Kriegbaum, B Leo-Kottler, H Wilhelm. 1. Universitäts-Augenklinik Tübingen, Abteilung für Pathophysiologie des Sehens und Neuroophthalmologie, Germany. holger.luedtke@uni-tuebingen.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: According to a recent pupillographic study, patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) show the same pupillary behaviour as normals. Because this raises many questions concerning the real nature of LHON and challenges our concept of the afferent pupillary system, we tried to verify the results of this study. METHODS: Pupillary function was assessed in 34 normal subjects and 40 patients with LHON. Pupillary light reflexes were recorded by means of the Compact Integrated Pupillograph (CIP, AMTech). Under mesopic conditions 200-ms stimuli were presented at two different stimulus intensities. Latency, constriction amplitude and baseline diameter were defined automatically. Pupil light reflexes were compared between LHON patients and normals and between the better and the worse eye in 20 LHON patients with different visual acuities. RESULTS: For both stimuli there were significant differences in latency between LHON patients and controls. The latency of the pupil light reflex proved to be about 20 ms longer for LHON patients, and the amplitude was significantly smaller for the bright stimulus. Within LHON patients, the eyes with the worse visual acuity had a significantly smaller constriction amplitude than the eyes with the better visual acuity. CONCLUSION: The results of our study confirm that LHON really is an optic nerve disease and that the pupillary light reflexes are not normal.
BACKGROUND: According to a recent pupillographic study, patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) show the same pupillary behaviour as normals. Because this raises many questions concerning the real nature of LHON and challenges our concept of the afferent pupillary system, we tried to verify the results of this study. METHODS: Pupillary function was assessed in 34 normal subjects and 40 patients with LHON. Pupillary light reflexes were recorded by means of the Compact Integrated Pupillograph (CIP, AMTech). Under mesopic conditions 200-ms stimuli were presented at two different stimulus intensities. Latency, constriction amplitude and baseline diameter were defined automatically. Pupil light reflexes were compared between LHON patients and normals and between the better and the worse eye in 20 LHON patients with different visual acuities. RESULTS: For both stimuli there were significant differences in latency between LHON patients and controls. The latency of the pupil light reflex proved to be about 20 ms longer for LHON patients, and the amplitude was significantly smaller for the bright stimulus. Within LHON patients, the eyes with the worse visual acuity had a significantly smaller constriction amplitude than the eyes with the better visual acuity. CONCLUSION: The results of our study confirm that LHON really is an optic nerve disease and that the pupillary light reflexes are not normal.
Authors: Ana Laura A Moura; Balázs V Nagy; Chiara La Morgia; Piero Barboni; André Gustavo Fernandes Oliveira; Solange R Salomão; Adriana Berezovsky; Milton Nunes de Moraes-Filho; Carlos Filipe Chicani; Rubens Belfort; Valerio Carelli; Alfredo A Sadun; Donald C Hood; Dora Fix Ventura Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 4.799