Literature DB >> 10090431

Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.

H Schenker1, S Maloney, C Liss, G Gormley, D Hartenbaum.   

Abstract

This study was designed to compare timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution 0.5% (timolol gel) once daily with timolol maleate ophthalmic solution 0.5% (timolol solution) twice daily with respect to patient preference, intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect, and tolerability. A total of 202 patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma and an IOP > or = 22 mm Hg were enrolled in this 12-week, randomized, observer-masked, two-period crossover study. Significantly more patients preferred timolol gel to timolol solution (P < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of patients preferring timolol gel strongly agreed or agreed that once-daily dosing was a reason for their preference. Those who preferred timolol solution did so because of fewer side effects. The mean IOP-lowering effects of the 2 treatments were similar at both morning trough and peak time points. The incidence of drug-related adverse experiences was similar (timolol gel 11.4% vs timolol solution 10.9%). Because both treatments were well tolerated and effective in lowering IOP, timolol gel, with its once-daily dosing regimen, should be considered in patients who are candidates for therapy with an ophthalmic beta-blocking agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10090431     DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88274-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  7 in total

Review 1.  Targeted Ocular Drug Delivery with Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Considerations.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Guang Wei Lu; Patrick Hughes
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  A novel EyePhone© App for improving adherence to glaucoma therapy.

Authors:  Ari Leshno; Dan Gaton; Reut Singer; Elior Eliasi; Ofri Vorobichik-Berar; Shiran Madgar; Ori Stern; Wasim Jaber; Noa Kapelushnik; Alon Skaat
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with latanoprost after a change in therapeutic regimen from timolol to brinzolamide in Japanese adult patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: open, non-randomized 12-week study.

Authors:  Shusaku Ishikawa; Yoshimi Nakamura; Yuko Nakamura; Hiroshi Sakai; Shoichi Sawaguchi; Kazuo Terashima; Makoto Kanno; Hidetoshi Yamashita
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12

4.  Osteoporosis medication profile preference: results from the PREFER-US study.

Authors:  Thomas W Weiss; Colleen A McHorney
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Comparative Study of Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Topical 0.3% Gatifloxacin Eye Gel and Solution in Rabbits.

Authors:  Manli Liu; Xin Zhao; Yao Yang; Qiang Yang; Jieting Zeng; Yujie Li; Xiaofeng Lin; Fang Duan
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-10

6.  Efficacy and safety of brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination compared with timolol in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Keiji Yoshikawa; Jun Kozaki; Hidetaka Maeda
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-10

7.  Safety and efficacy of a fixed versus unfixed brinzolamide/timolol combination in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Mikio Nagayama; Toru Nakajima; Junji Ono
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.