Literature DB >> 10089855

The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure (PATH-CHF) study: rationale, design, and endpoints of a prospective randomized multicenter study.

A Auricchio1, C Stellbrink, S Sack, M Block, J Vogt, P Bakker, P Mortensen, H Klein.   

Abstract

In conjunction with pharmacologic therapy, pacing has been proposed as a potential treatment to decrease symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Uncontrolled studies of pacing therapy for CHF dealing with different pacing sites, modes of pacing, and atrioventricular delays have reported mixed outcomes. The Pacing Therapies in Congestive Heart Failure (PATH-CHF) study is a single-blind, randomized, crossover, controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of pacing on acute hemodynamic function and to assess chronic clinical benefit in patients with moderate-to-severe CHF. The effect of pacing on oxygen consumption at peak exercise and at anaerobic threshold during cardiopulmonary exercise tests, and on 6-minute walk distance, have been selected as primary endpoints of the study. Secondary endpoints of the trial were changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, quality-of-life as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, and hospitalization frequency. Finally, changes in ejection fraction, cardiac output, and filling pattern were assessed by echocardiography. The trial was planned to include 53 patients from 7 centers in Europe over a period of 3 years. The study was divided into 2 parts: acute testing and chronic follow-up. The acute study, performed during the pacemaker implantation, involved extensive testing using a custom-designed computer (FLEXSTIM) and a unique burst pacing protocol (FLEXSTIM protocol) to determine the best ventricular pacing sites and the most appropriate atrioventricular delays. The chronic phase consisted of a crossover study designed to test in each patient the best univentricular pacing site and biventricular pacing as assessed by the acute hemodynamic study. The study started with the first implant in 1995 and has, to date, included 42 patients. The study is expected to be completed by the end of 1998. The results of a first interim analysis showed trends toward improvement in all primary and secondary endpoints during the pacing periods compared with no pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10089855     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01014-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  23 in total

Review 1.  Developing clinical indication for multisite pacing.

Authors:  L Kappenberger; X Lyon; N Cox; G Girod; J Schlaepfer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Emerging indications for permanent pacing.

Authors:  D L Wolbrette; G V Naccarelli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Triple-site pacing in patients with biventricular device-incidence of the phenomenon and cardiac resynchronization benefit.

Authors:  Alan Bulava; Gerardo Ansalone; Renato Ricci; Paride Giannantoni; Carlo Pignalberi; Petr Heinc; Jan Lukl; Massimo Santini
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Real-time stroke volume measurements for the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy parameters.

Authors:  José M Dizon; T Alexander Quinn; Santos E Cabreriza; Daniel Wang; Henry M Spotnitz; Kathleen Hickey; Hasan Garan
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 5.  [Peculiarities in the follow up of resynchronization therapy].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2005-03

6.  Optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy: addressing the problem of "non-responders".

Authors:  D J Fox; A P Fitzpatrick; N C Davidson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Congestive heart failure treatment: the pacing approach.

Authors:  T J Dresing; A Natale
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  ECG Patterns In Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Antonius van Stipdonk; Sofieke Wijers; Mathias Meine; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

9.  Clinical validation of a real-time data processing system for cardiac output and arterial pressure measurement during intraoperative biventricular pacing optimization.

Authors:  Christopher K Johnson; Santos E Cabreriza; Rana L Sahar; Alexander Rusanov; Daniel Y Wang; Bin Cheng; Mira S Gendy; T Alexander Quinn; Henry Michael Spotnitz
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 10.  Advances in devices for cardiac resynchronization in heart failure.

Authors:  Chu-Pak Lau; Serge Barold; Hung-Fat Tse; Kathy Lai-Fun Lee; Hon-Wah Chan; Katherine Fan; Elaine Chau; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.