Literature DB >> 10089187

Views of managed care--a survey of students, residents, faculty, and deans at medical schools in the United States.

S R Simon1, R J Pan, A M Sullivan, N Clark-Chiarelli, M T Connelly, A S Peters, J D Singer, T S Inui, S D Block.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Views of managed care among academic physicians and medical students in the United States are not well known. In 1997, we conducted a telephone survey of a national sample of medical students (506 respondents), residents (494), faculty members (728), department chairs (186), directors of residency training in internal medicine and pediatrics (143), and deans (105) at U.S. medical schools to determine their experiences in and perspectives on managed care. The overall rate of response was 80.1 percent.
RESULTS: Respondents rated their attitudes toward managed care on a 0-to-10 scale, with 0 defined as "as negative as possible" and 10 as "as positive as possible." The expressed attitudes toward managed care were negative, ranging from a low mean (+/-SD) score of 3.9+/-1.7 for residents to a high of 5.0+/-1.3 for deans. When asked about specific aspects of care, fee-for-service medicine was rated better than managed care in terms of access (by 80.2 percent of respondents), minimizing ethical conflicts (74.8 percent), and the quality of the doctor-patient relationship (70.6 percent). With respect to the continuity of care, 52.0 percent of respondents preferred fee-for-service medicine, and 29.3 percent preferred managed care. For care at the end of life, 49.1 percent preferred fee-for-service medicine, and 20.5 percent preferred managed care. With respect to care for patients with chronic illness, 41.8 percent preferred fee-for-service care, and 30.8 percent preferred managed care. Faculty members, residency-training directors, and department chairs responded that managed care had reduced the time they had available for research (63.1 percent agreed) and teaching (58.9 percent) and had reduced their income (55.8 percent). Overall, 46.6 percent of faculty members, 26.7 percent of residency-training directors, and 42.7 percent of department chairs reported that the message they delivered to students about managed care was negative.
CONCLUSIONS: Negative views of managed care are widespread among medical students, residents, faculty members, and medical school deans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10089187     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199903253401206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of osteopathic and allopathic medical Schools' support for primary care.

Authors:  A S Peters; N Clark-Chiarelli; S D Block
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The changing perceptions of junior medical students about the current U.S. health care system after a seminar series.

Authors:  F W Markham; H K Sawhney; J A Butler; J J Diamond
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-10

Review 3.  The computer-based lecture.

Authors:  M M Wofford; A W Spickard; J L Wofford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Physician discontent: a barometer of change and need for intervention.

Authors:  J S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The growth of managed care and changes in physicians' incomes, autonomy, and satisfaction, 1991-1997.

Authors:  Jack Hadley; Jean M Mitchell
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2002-03

6.  President's address: "spacetime" and the academic and clinical missions of medical schools.

Authors:  Robert M Carey
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2003

7.  Specialists' and primary care physicians' participation in medicaid managed care.

Authors:  L Backus; D Osmond; K Grumbach; K Vranizan; L Phuong; A B Bindman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  A descriptive study of managed-care hassles in 26 practices.

Authors:  L S Sommers; T W Hacker; D M Schneider; P A Pugno; J B Garrett
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-03

9.  Academic health systems management: the rationale behind capitated contracts.

Authors:  P A Taheri; D A Butz; L J Greenfield
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Physicians' perceptions of the changing health care system: comparisons by gender and specialties.

Authors:  M Hojat; J S Gonnella; J B Erdmann; J J Veloski; D Z Louis; T J Nasca; S L Rattner
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.