Literature DB >> 10089090

Mechanical ventilation in critically ill cancer patients: outcome and utilisation of resources.

U E Kongsgaard1, N K Meidell.   

Abstract

Intensive care is increasingly being used in the management of cancer patients. It is important that a disproportionate share of special care resources is not expended on futile care of terminally ill patients. A requirement for mechanical ventilation has been stated to affect survival in cancer patients. The objectives of this study were to determine our hospital utilisation of ICU facilities and the prospects of a successful outcome in cancer patients with a need for ventilatory support. The Norwegian Radium Hospital is a 400-bed cancer hospital with a 12-bed combined postoperative and intensive care unit (PO/ICU). For each patient admitted to the PO/ICU, patient data including diagnosis, therapeutic interventions, use of resources and outcome are entered in a computerised database. We reviewed all 10,051 patients admitted during a 5-year period, focusing on the patients receiving ventilatory support. There were 347 patients who were treated with mechanical ventilation, 228 patients only for a short period postoperatively after extensive surgery. A further 119 patients (mean age 68 years, mean SAPS 33.5) were treated with mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h or died during treatment in the ICU; 65 patients (55%) were admitted after elective surgery, 24 (20%) after surgical emergencies and 30 (25%) after medical emergencies. Metastatic disease was present in 59% of them. These 119 patients comprised 1.18% of all patients admitted to the PO/ICU, but utilised 28% of all resources. They included 34 patients (29%) who died during the ICU stay, while 69 patients (58%) were still alive after 6 months. The ICU mortality in different groups was: surgical patients 24%, gynaecological patients 9%, oncological patients 63%. The mortality in the age group >70 years was 15%. The role of ICU facilities, including mechanical ventilation, is important for optimal supportive care in cancer patients. Our results indicate that this treatment modality should not generally be restricted in critically ill cancer patients. The quality of life of the patients who survived should be of interest to those involved in further medical and ethical decisions concerning the level of care in the ICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10089090     DOI: 10.1007/s005200050234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  7 in total

1.  Intensive care unit mortality in solid tumor patients: is this predictable and preventable?

Authors:  Antonio M Esquinas; Egbert Pravinkumar
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Leucopenia is an independent predictor in cancer patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a prognostic factor analysis in a series of 168 patients.

Authors:  F Vallot; M Paesmans; T Berghmans; J P Sculier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Patients with haematological malignancies requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: differences between survivors and non-survivors in intensive care unit.

Authors:  Radoslaw Owczuk; Magdalena A Wujtewicz; Wioletta Sawicka; Anna Wadrzyk; Maria Wujtewicz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Comparison of three severity scores for critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Peter Schellongowski; Michael Benesch; Thomas Lang; Friederike Traunmüller; Christian Zauner; Klaus Laczika; Gottfried J Locker; Michael Frass; Thomas Staudinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Outcome and predictors of mortality in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure while undergoing ambulatory chemotherapy for solid cancers.

Authors:  So Young Park; So Yeon Lim; Sang-Won Um; Won-Jung Koh; Man Pyo Chung; Hojoong Kim; O Jung Kwon; Hye Kyeong Park; Seok Jin Kim; Young Hyuck Im; Myung-Ju Ahn; Gee Young Suh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Improved survival of critically ill cancer patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Jérôme Larché; Elie Azoulay; Fabienne Fieux; Laurent Mesnard; Delphine Moreau; Guillaume Thiery; Michaël Darmon; Jean-Roger Le Gall; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Resource use and outcome in critically ill patients with hematological malignancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tobias M Merz; Pascale Schär; Michael Bühlmann; Jukka Takala; Hans U Rothen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.